VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall 95C

CaseIH Farmall 95C

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Farmall 95C
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall 95C VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Jesi, Italy 
Original price (USD) $43, 874 (2011)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
23.2 gal (47.15 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Engine RPMs 540@22061000@2260   vs 0.5% Farm Tractors have 540@22061000@2260
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Straddle Deck Platform With Rops. Cab Optional. 
Differential lock Rear Standard 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Bosch Fuel Injection Pump  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have diesel Bosch fuel injection pump
Engine Type Fiat Powertrain Technologies (fpt)  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
274 ci (32.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2300  (2298 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Elements 
Engine Emissions Tier Iii 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
95 hp (34.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Grid Heater 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Dry Disc 
Transmission Type Mechanical Shuttle  vs 5% Farm Tractors have mechanical shuttle
Transmission Comments Four Synchronized Gears (1-4) In Four Ranges (l/ml/mh/h) With Synchronized Mechanical Shuttle. 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase
86 inches (8.33 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
7180 lbs (7162 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Height (cab)
91.4 inches (18.14 inches lower than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Height (ROPS)
77.8 inches (16.34 inches lower than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Pump flow
16.1 gpm (3.36 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
25.5 gpm (0.85 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Rear valves
1 to (1.55 to lower than average)
vs
2.55 to

Steering flow
9.4 gpm (2.56 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Wet Disc 
Transmission-2 Type Power Shuttle 
Transmission-2 Comments Four Synchronized Gears (1-4) In Four Ranges (l/ml/mh/h) With Clutchless Power Shuttle. 
Transmission-2 Gears
16 forward (4.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Transmission-2 Speeds   
Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih L720 
Loader Height (to pin)
124 inches (7.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
86 inches (4.98 inches lower than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
28 inches (1.88 inches lower than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
64  (14.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
45  (10.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2100 lbs (2098 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Breakout force (lift)
2650 lbs (2647 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,764 lbs

Loader-2
Loader-2 Loader type Caseih L730 
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
133 inches (3.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
96 inches (4.51 inches lower than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
25 inches (12.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
55  (1.99 lower than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
50  (214.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
2500 lbs (2497 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

Loader-2 Breakout force (lift)
3100 lbs (3097 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,581 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3960 lbs (3954 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
80 hp (32.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
89.8 hp (87.45 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
72.8 hp (91.15 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine (gross)
95 hp (0.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front
11.2R24  (12.9 lower than average)
vs 0.9% Farm Tractors have 11.2R24
Ag rear
16.9R30  (7.89 lower than average)
vs 3.3% Farm Tractors have 16.9R30
Lawn/turf front
13.6-16.1  (9.26 lower than average)
vs
22.86

Lawn/turf rear
16.9-24  (11.2 lower than average)
vs
28.10

Industrial front 12.5/80-18  
Industrial rear
19.5L-24  (3.12 lower than average)
vs 3.7% Farm Tractors have 19.5L-24
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
730  (108.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved