VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland TN95DA

New Holland TN95DA

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
New Holland TN95DA
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland TN95DA VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Factory Jesi, Italy 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
23.5 gal (46.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Wet Disc  vs 2.2% Farm Tractors have differential wet disc
Cab Cab Standard. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Iveco  vs 4.4% Farm Tractors have Iveco
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
274 ci (32.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2300  (2298 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
269 lb (191.1 lb lower than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1400  (50.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Emissions Tier 2 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
90 hp (39.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Fuel use
5.2 gal (1.23 gal higher than average)
vs
3.97 gal

Transmission
Transmission Clutch Six 113mm Wet Organic Discs 
Transmission Type Partially Synchronized With Power Shuttle  vs 1.1% Farm Tractors have partially synchronized with power shuttle
Transmission Comments Left-hand Clutchless Power Shuttle 
Transmission Transmission Synchro Command 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
67.2 inches (4.98 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
86 inches (8.33 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
6835 lbs (6817 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Length
159.8 inches (2.16 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (cab)
90.8 inches (18.74 inches lower than average)
vs
109.54 inches

4WD turn radius
12.7 feet (5.27 feet lower than average)
vs
17.97 feet

Weight (ballasted)
8080 lbs (8057 lbs higher than average)
vs
23,578 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
1 to (1.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2755 psi (2753 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Valve flow
15 gpm (2.08 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Steering flow
9.4 gpm (2.56 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3960 lbs (3954 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
77 hp (35.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
83.7 hp (93.55 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
74 hp (89.95 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine (gross)
90 hp (5.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
85  (26.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
730  (108.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52

Variants
TN95A ROPS  
TN95DA Cab 


Scroll To Top

saved