Home > Farm Tractors > Massey Ferguson 8680

Massey Ferguson 8680

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

Massey Ferguson 8680

Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare

Massey Ferguson 8680

VS

All other Farm Tractors

Production
Model Year		2009
Production Manufacturer		Massey Ferguson	vs	7.8% Farm Tractors have Massey Ferguson	compare Massey Ferguson Farm Tractors
Factory		Beauvais, France

Capacity
Capacity Fuel		155.9 gal (85.55 gal higher than average)	vs	70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs		540 (68.25 lower than average)	vs	608.25
Rear PTO		Independent Electro-hydaulic	vs	0.9% Farm Tractors have independent electro-hydaulic
Front PTO		Optional	vs	86.9% Farm Tractors have optional
Front RPMs		1000 (24.69 lower than average)	vs	1024.69

Mechanical
Chassis		4x4 Mfwd 4wd	vs	52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes		Hydraulic Wet Disc	vs	24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab		Cab Standard With Heat And Air-conditioning. Optional Heated Seat, Power Adjustable Mirrors, And Automatic Temperature Control.

Engine
Engine Fuel		Diesel	vs	87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type		AGCO SISU POWER 84CTA (1696.72 lower than average)	vs	1.1% Farm Tractors have AGCO SISU POWER 84CTA
Engine Aspiration		Turbocharged Intercooled	vs	18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders		6 (1.54 higher than average)	vs	4.46
Engine Bore/Stroke		4.37x5.71 Inches [111 X 145 Mm]
Engine Displacement		512.6 ci (206.5 ci higher than average)	vs	306.10 ci	Compare similar Engine Displacement (512.6) ci
Engine Cooling		Liquid	vs	86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression		16.7:1
Engine Rated RPMs		2200 (2198 higher than average)	vs	2,340	Compare similar Engine Rated RPMs (2,200)
Engine Torque		1100 lb (639.9 lb higher than average)	vs	460.10 lb
Engine Torque RPMs		1500 (49.19 higher than average)	vs	1450.81
Engine Comments		The Engine Uses Agco's E3 Selective Catalytic Reduction (scr) System To Reduce Nitrogen Oxides (nox). The System Uses A Diesel Exhaust Fluid That Is Injected Into The Exhaust Gas.
Engine Power		320 hp (190.86 hp higher than average)	vs	129.14 hp	Compare similar Engine Power (320) hp
Engine Starter type		Electric
Maximum Power		350 hp (30.67 hp lower than average)	vs	380.67 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission		Dyna-vt
Transmission Gears		Infinite Forward And Reverse
Transmission Speeds

Dimensions
Wheelbase		122.2 inches (27.87 inches higher than average)	vs	94.33 inches
Length		223.2 inches (61.24 inches higher than average)	vs	161.96 inches
Height (cab)		133.1 inches (23.56 inches higher than average)	vs	109.54 inches
Weight (max capacity)		38890 lbs (38841 lbs higher than average)	vs	49,610 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type		Closed Center Load Sensing
Hydraulics Valves		4 to (1.36 to higher than average)	vs	2.64 to
Pressure		2901 psi (2899 psi higher than average)	vs	2,737 psi
Pump flow		26.4 gpm (6.94 gpm higher than average)	vs	19.46 gpm
Total flow		46.2 gpm (21.55 gpm higher than average)	vs	24.65 gpm

Loader
Loader Weight		1778 lbs (608.69 lbs higher than average)	vs	1169.31 lbs
Loader Loader type		Massey Ferguson 985
Loader Height (to pin)		189 inches (72.3 inches higher than average)	vs	116.70 inches
Loader Dump clearance		148 inches (57.02 inches higher than average)	vs	90.98 inches
Loader Dump reach		22 inches (7.88 inches lower than average)	vs	29.88 inches
Loader Dump angle		54 (4.94 higher than average)	vs	49.06
Loader Rollback angle		40 (5.92 higher than average)	vs	34.08
Loader Lift to full height (at pin)		5335 lbs (5333 lbs higher than average)	vs	2,412 lbs
Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)		4700 lbs (4697 lbs higher than average)	vs	3,565 lbs
Loader Breakout force (lift)		7319 lbs (7316 lbs higher than average)	vs	3,764 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type		III IV (36.36 lower than average)	vs	1% Farm Tractors have III IV
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)		21336 lbs (21330 lbs higher than average)	vs	6,099 lbs
Front Hitch		III (2 lower than average)	vs	7.8% Farm Tractors have III
Rear lift (at ends)		26460 lbs (26454 lbs higher than average)	vs	6,180 lbs
Front lift (at ends)		11020 lbs (11011 lbs higher than average)	vs	9,829 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)		275 hp (162.32 hp higher than average)	vs	112.68 hp
Engine		320 hp (172.18 hp higher than average)	vs	147.82 hp	Compare similar Engine (320) hp

Electrical
Charging system		Alternator
Charging amps		240 (128.88 higher than average)	vs	111.12

Tires
Ag front		620/65R34
Ag rear		710/75R42

Battery
Volts		12 (equals average)	vs	12.00

Related Comparisons

Massey Ferguson 8680

Massey Ferguson 8680

Challenger MT665B

Massey Ferguson 8680

Challenger MT655C

Massey Ferguson 8680

CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT

Massey Ferguson 8680

CaseIH Steiger 485QT Quadtrac

Massey Ferguson 8680

Popular Items

AGCO DT250B Compare

AGCO RT180A Compare

Challenger MT665B Compare

Challenger MT655C Compare

CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT Compare

CaseIH Steiger 485QT Quadtrac Compare

Related Questions

how big is the engine in Massey Ferguson 8680 farm tractor? What is the fuel capacity of Massey Ferguson 8680?