VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Massey Ferguson 5475

Massey Ferguson 5475

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Massey Ferguson 5475
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Massey Ferguson 5475 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Massey Ferguson  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have Massey Ferguson
Capacity
Capacity Fuel 38 Gal [143.8 L] 55 Gal [208.2 L] (optional)  vs 0.1% Farm Tractors have 38 gal [143.8 L] 55 gal [208.2 L] (optional)
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Cab Two-post Rops. Cab Optional. 
Differential lock Electro-hydraulic 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Perkins 1106  vs 0.6% Farm Tractors have Perkins 1106
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
402 ci (95.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Emissions Tier Iii 
Engine Power
135 hp (5.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Four Power Shift Gears In Four Ranges. 
Transmission Transmission Dyna-4 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width 79.3 Inches [201 Cm] (min)100.4 Inches [255 Cm] (max) 
Wheelbase
112.3 inches (17.97 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
189.7 inches (27.74 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (cab)
110.2 inches (0.66 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Centerclosed Center (with Cab) 
Valve flow 15 Gpm [56.8 Lpm] (open Center)26 Gpm [98.4 Lpm] (open- Optional)29 Gpm [109.8 Lpm] (closed Center) 
Loader
Loader Weight
1366 lbs (196.69 lbs higher than average)
vs
1169.31 lbs

Loader Loader type Massey Ferguson 955 
Loader Height (to pin)
157 inches (40.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
116 inches (25.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
19 inches (10.88 inches lower than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
58  (8.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
41  (6.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
4409 lbs (4407 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3750 lbs (3747 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,565 lbs

Loader Reach at ground
79 inches (6.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

Loader Breakout force (at pin)
5291 lbs (5288 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,719 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)
4519 lbs (4515 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,430 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
5 s (0.67 s higher than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader-2
Loader-2 Weight
1219 lbs (355.43 lbs lower than average)
vs
1574.43 lbs

Loader-2 Loader type Massey Ferguson 950 
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
157 inches (27.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
116 inches (15.49 inches higher than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
19 inches (18.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
58  (1.01 higher than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
41  (223.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
5071 lbs (5068 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3527 lbs (3524 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,137 lbs

Loader-2 Reach at ground
79 inches (6.41 inches lower than average)
vs
85.41 inches

Loader-2 Breakout force (at pin)
6173 lbs (6169 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,937 lbs

Loader-2 Breakout force (at 800mm)
4189 lbs (4185 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,543 lbs

Loader-2 Raise time to height
6 s (1.11 s higher than average)
vs
4.89 s

Power
PTO (claimed)
110 hp (2.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine (gross)
135 hp (39.85 hp higher than average)
vs
95.15 hp



Scroll To Top

saved