VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Puma 140

CaseIH Puma 140

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Puma 140
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Puma 140 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Original price (USD) $105, 788 (2010)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
79 gal (8.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system
19.6 gal (0.18 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard With Air-conditioning. Optional Suspended Cab. 
Trailer brakes Hydraulic Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
CNH  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 4.6% Farm Tractors have CNH
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
411 ci (104.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Oil capacity
16 qts (0.93 qts lower than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Six Power-shift Gears In Three Ranges. 
Transmission Gears
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase 107.8 Inches [273 Cm] 109.7 Inches [278 Cm] (suspended Front Axle) 
Weight (operating)
13725 lbs (13707 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Height (cab)
118.3 inches (8.76 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Front tread 61.8 To 89.2 Inches [156 To 226 Cm] 
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Capacity (cu. ft.)
19.6 gal (0.18 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Valve flow
26.5 gpm (9.42 gpm higher than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
43.7 gpm (19.05 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
17 gpm (10.16 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Transmission Powershift With Econogear 
Transmission-2 Gears
19 forward (1.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih L760 
Loader Height (to pin)
167 inches (50.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
129 inches (38.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
31 inches (1.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
56  (6.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
43  (8.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)
4300 lbs (4297 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,565 lbs

Loader Breakout force (lift)
4999 lbs (4996 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,764 lbs

Loader Reach at ground
107 inches (34.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 2/3N  
Rear lift 12, 185 Lbs [5527 Kg] 15, 197 Lbs [6893 Kg] (100mm Cylinders) 
Power
PTO (claimed)
120 hp (7.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
137.5 hp (39.75 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
99.9 hp (64.05 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Standard tires (ag) Front: 14.9r28. Rear: 18.4r38 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
960  (121.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved