| Challenger MT297B | VS | All other Farm Tractors |
| Production | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Year | 2005 | ||||
| Production Manufacturer | Iseki | vs | 2.3% Farm Tractors have Iseki |
||
| Factory | Matsuyama, Japan | ||||
| Distributor | AGCO | ||||
| Capacity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity Fuel |
13.2 gal (57.15 gal lower than average)
|
vs |
70.35 gal
|
||
| Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear RPMs |
540 (68.25 lower than average)
|
vs |
608.25
|
||
| Rear PTO | Independent | vs | 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent |
||
| Mechanical | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Steering | Hydrostatic Power | vs | 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power |
||
| Chassis | 4x4 Mfwd 4wd | vs | 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD |
||
| Brakes | Wet Disc | vs | 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc |
||
| Cab | ROPS | ||||
| Transmission | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission Comments | Three Ranges With Four Gears Each. Transmission Can Be Shifted From Forward To Reverse On The Go, Without The Clutch. In-range Gear Changes Can Be Made On The Go With The Clutch. | ||||
| Transmission Transmission | Powershuttle | ||||
| Transmission Gears |
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
|
vs |
15.13 forward
|
||
| Dimensions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions Width |
69.7 inches (2.48 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
72.18 inches
|
||
| Wheelbase |
79 inches (15.33 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
94.33 inches
|
||
| Length |
134.6 inches (27.36 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
161.96 inches
|
||
| Height |
91.7 inches (15.27 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
106.97 inches
|
||
| Hydraulics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydraulics Type | Open Center | ||||
| Pressure |
2276 psi (2274 psi higher than average)
|
vs |
2,737 psi
|
||
| Valve flow |
11.5 gpm (5.58 gpm lower than average)
|
vs |
17.08 gpm
|
||
| Total flow |
17.5 gpm (7.15 gpm lower than average)
|
vs |
24.65 gpm
|
||
| Steering flow |
6 gpm (0.84 gpm lower than average)
|
vs |
6.84 gpm
|
||
| 3-Point Hitch | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Type | I/II | ||||
| Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) |
3307 lbs (3301 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
6,099 lbs
|
||
| Rear lift (at ends) |
3750 lbs (3744 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
6,180 lbs
|
||
| Power | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTO (claimed) |
46.4 hp (66.28 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
112.68 hp
|
||
| Engine |
59.1 hp (88.72 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
147.82 hp
|
||
| Tires | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag front |
9.5-16 (14.6 lower than average)
|
vs |
24.10
|
||
| Ag rear |
16.9-26 (7.89 lower than average)
|
vs |
24.79
|
||
| Industrial front |
12-16.5 (11.25 lower than average)
|
vs |
23.25
|
||
| Industrial rear |
18.4-24 (4.22 lower than average)
|
vs |
22.62
|
||
Related Comparisons
Challenger MT297B
CaseIH Farmall 60
Kubota M8540 Power Krawler
Massey Ferguson 3425
Massey Ferguson 573
Massey Ferguson 2670 HD
Massey Ferguson 2680 HD