VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Comparison

Compare Challenger MT297B VS CaseIH Farmall 60
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 30 differences and 27 similarities between Challenger MT297B, CaseIH Farmall 60
 
Production
Model Year   2005 vs   2008  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Production Manufacturer   Iseki vs   Shibaura  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Production Manufacturer”

Factory   Matsuyama, Japan vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Factory”

Distributor   Agco vs   Caseih  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Distributor”

Add Comment about “Production

cancel
Capacity
Capacity Fuel   
13.2 gal
vs   13.5 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Capacity Fuel”

Add Comment about “Capacity

cancel
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs   
540
vs   540
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear RPMs”

Rear PTO   Independent vs   Independent  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear PTO”

Add Comment about “Power Take-off (PTO)

cancel
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering   Hydrostatic Power vs   Hydrostatic Power  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Mechanical Steering”

Chassis   4x4 Mfwd 4wd vs   4x4 Mfwd 4wd  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Chassis”

Brakes   Wet Disc vs   Wet Disc  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brakes”

Cab   Rops vs   Rops  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cab”

Add Comment about “Mechanical

cancel
Engine
Engine Fuel   Diesel vs   Diesel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Fuel”

Engine Type    vs   Shibaura Ism-n844l-t  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Type”

Engine Aspiration    vs   Turbocharged  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Aspiration”

Engine Cylinders   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cylinders”

Engine Bore/Stroke    vs   3.31x3.94 Inches [84 X 100 Mm]  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Bore/Stroke”

Engine Displacement   
180 ci
vs   135.2 ci
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Displacement”

Engine Cooling   Liquid vs   Liquid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cooling”

Engine Rated RPMs   
2,600
vs   2,800
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Rated RPMs”

Engine Power   
59.1 hp
vs   60 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Power”

Add Comment about “Engine

cancel
Transmission
Transmission Comments   Three Ranges With Four Gears Each. Transmission Can Be Shifted From Forward To Reverse On The Go, Without The Clutch. In-range Gear Changes Can Be Made On The Go With The Clutch. vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Comments”

Transmission Transmission   Powershuttle vs   Synchro Shuttle  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Transmission”

Transmission Gears   
12 forward
vs   12 forward
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Gears”

Add Comment about “Transmission

cancel
Dimensions
Dimensions Width   
69.7 inches
vs   64.4 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Dimensions Width”

Dimensions / Weight   
4,078 lbs
vs   4, 209 Lbs [1909 Kg] (synchro)4, 238 Lbs [1922 Kg] (power Shuttle)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Dimensions / Weight”

Wheelbase   
79 inches
vs   74.8 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Wheelbase”

Length   
134.6 inches
vs   137.3 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Length”

Height   
91.7 inches
vs   95 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Height”

Ground Clearance   
15.7 inches
vs   12.9 Inches [32 Cm] (front Axle)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ground Clearance”

Add Comment about “Dimensions

cancel
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type   Open Center vs   Open Center  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulics Type”

Pressure   
2,276 psi
vs   2,489 psi
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Pressure”

Valve flow   
11.5 gpm
vs   12 gpm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Valve flow”

Total flow   
17.5 gpm
vs   17.53 gpm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total flow”

Steering flow   
6 gpm
vs   5.5 gpm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Steering flow”

Add Comment about “Hydraulics

cancel
Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Transmission    vs   Power Shuttle  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Transmission”

Transmission-2 Gears    vs   12 forward
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Gears”

Add Comment about “Transmission-2

cancel
Loader
Loader Loader type    vs   L360  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Loader type”

Loader Height (to pin)    vs   112.3 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Height (to pin)”

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)    vs   2,500 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Lift to full height (at pin)”

Add Comment about “Loader

cancel
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type   
I/ii
vs   I/ii
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Type”

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)   
3,307 lbs
vs   3,465 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)”

Rear lift (at ends)   
3,750 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at ends)”

Add Comment about “3-Point Hitch

cancel
Power
PTO (claimed)   
46.4 hp
vs   50 Hp [37.3 Kw] (power Shuttle)51 Hp [38.0 Kw] (synchro)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (claimed)”

PTO (tested)    vs   51.57 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (tested)”

Engine   
59.1 hp
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine”

Engine (gross)    vs   60 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine (gross)”

Add Comment about “Power

cancel
Electrical
Charging system    vs   Alternator  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging system”

Charging amps    vs   55
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging amps”

Add Comment about “Electrical

cancel
Tires
Ag front   
9.5-16
vs   8x169.5x16  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ag front”

Ag rear   
16.9-26
vs   14.9x2414.9x28  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ag rear”

Lawn/turf front    vs   27x10.5-1527/12llx15  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Lawn/turf front”

Lawn/turf rear    vs   44-18.00-2022.5llx16.1  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Lawn/turf rear”

Industrial front   
12-16.5
vs   12-16.5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Industrial front”

Industrial rear   
18.4-24
vs   18.4-24
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Industrial rear”

Add Comment about “Tires

cancel
Battery
Volts    vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Volts”

Number    vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number”

Cold-cranking amps    vs   750
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cold-cranking amps”

Add Comment about “Battery

cancel

Compare Challenger MT297B vs CaseIH Farmall 60 Farm Tractors


Scroll To Top

saved