VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT275B

Challenger MT275B

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT275B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2005  
Production Manufacturer Iseki  vs 2.3% Farm Tractors have Iseki
Factory Matsuyama, Japan 
Distributor AGCO  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
10.6 gal (59.75 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mid PTO Optional  vs 53.5% Farm Tractors have optional
Mid RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,034

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Cab Two-post Foldable Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Indirect Injection  vs 1.6% Farm Tractors have diesel indirect injection
Engine Type Iseki  vs 3% Farm Tractors have Iseki
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
94.1 ci (212 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2600  (2598 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual-stage Dry 
Engine Power
40.1 hp (89.04 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Glow Plugs 
Transmission
Transmission Type Hydrostatic  vs 14% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic
Transmission Gears Infinite (3-range) Forward And Reverse 
Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Dimensions Width
62.2 inches (9.98 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
69.7 inches (24.63 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
121 inches (40.96 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
87.4 inches (19.57 inches lower than average)
vs
106.97 inches

2WD turn radius
9.2 feet (4.35 feet lower than average)
vs
13.55 feet

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Pressure
2276 psi (2274 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Valve flow
8.3 gpm (8.78 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
12.7  (11.95 lower than average)
vs
24.65

Steering flow 4.4 Gpm [16.7 Lpm] (sync Shuttle)5.4 Gpm [20.4 Lpm] (power Shuttle/hydro) 
Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Dry 
Transmission-2 Type Partially Synchronized With Power Shuttle 
Transmission-2 Comments Transmssion May Be Shifted From Forward To Reverse, With The Same Gear, On The Go. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Synchroshuttle 
Transmission-2 Gears
8 forward (12.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Transmission-2 Speeds   
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
(36.36 lower than average)
vs 26.5% Farm Tractors have I
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2535 lbs (2529 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Rear lift (at ends)
2800 lbs (2794 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed) 31.550 Hp [23.5 Kw] (gear)29.5 Hp [22.0 Kw] (hydro) 
Engine
40.1 hp (107.72 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
40  (71.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front
8-16  (16.1 lower than average)
vs
24.10

Ag rear
12.4-2413.6-24  (12.39 lower than average)
vs
24.79

Lawn/turf front 27x8.50-15 
Lawn/turf rear 41x14.00-20 
Industrial front
10-16.5  (13.25 lower than average)
vs
23.25

Industrial rear
14.9-24  (7.72 lower than average)
vs
22.62

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65



Scroll To Top

saved