Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Magnum 210

CaseIH Magnum 210

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

CaseIH Magnum 210

Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare

CaseIH Magnum 210

VS

All other Farm Tractors

Production
Model Year		2009
Production Manufacturer		Caseih	vs	11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH	compare CaseIH Farm Tractors
Factory		Racine, Wisconsin, Usa

Capacity
Capacity Fuel		118 gal (47.65 gal higher than average)	vs	70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs		540 (68.25 lower than average)	vs	608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering		Hydrostatic Power	vs	81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis		4x4 Mfwd 4wd	vs	52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes		Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc	vs	7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab		Surveyor Cab

Engine
Engine Fuel		Diesel	vs	87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type		CDC (1696.72 lower than average)	vs	0.8% Farm Tractors have CDC
Engine Aspiration		Turbocharged Intercooled	vs	18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders		6 (1.54 higher than average)	vs	4.46
Engine Bore/Stroke		4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm]
Engine Displacement		411 ci (104.9 ci higher than average)	vs	306.10 ci	Compare similar Engine Displacement (411) ci
Engine Cooling		Liquid	vs	86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs		2200 (2198 higher than average)	vs	2,340	Compare similar Engine Rated RPMs (2,200)
Engine Valves		24 (2.87 higher than average)	vs	21.13
Engine Power		210 hp (80.86 hp higher than average)	vs	129.14 hp	Compare similar Engine Power (210) hp
Engine Oil capacity		17 qts (0.07 qts higher than average)	vs	16.93 qts
Engine Emissions		Tier 3
Maximum Power		260 hp (120.67 hp lower than average)	vs	380.67 hp

Transmission
Transmission Type		Full Power Shift	vs	15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Gears		18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)	vs	15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase		118.3 inches (23.97 inches higher than average)	vs	94.33 inches
Height (cab)		128.5 inches (18.96 inches higher than average)	vs	109.54 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type		Pressue Flow Compensated (pfc)
Hydraulics Valves		3 to (0.36 to higher than average)	vs	2.64 to
Total flow		39.6 gpm (14.95 gpm higher than average)	vs	24.65 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type		Full Power Shift
Transmission-2 Gears		19 forward (1.15 forward lower than average)	vs	20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type		II/III
Rear lift		12, 787 Lbs [5800 Kg] 15, 873 Lbs [7199 Kg] (optional)

Power
PTO (claimed)		180 hp (67.32 hp higher than average)	vs	112.68 hp
PTO (tested)		203 hp (25.75 hp higher than average)	vs	177.25 hp
Drawbar (tested)		155.8 hp (8.15 hp lower than average)	vs	163.95 hp
Engine		210 hp (62.18 hp higher than average)	vs	147.82 hp	Compare similar Engine (210) hp

Electrical
Ground		Negative
Charging system		Alternator
Charging amps		150200 (optional)

Related Comparisons

CaseIH Magnum 210

Challenger MT475B

CaseIH Magnum 210

CaseIH Magnum 210

CaseIH Puma 115

CaseIH Magnum 210

CaseIH Puma 125

CaseIH Magnum 210

CaseIH Puma 140

CaseIH Magnum 210

Popular Items

AGCO RT180A Compare

Challenger MT475B Compare

Belarus 6520 Compare

CaseIH Puma 115 Compare

CaseIH Puma 125 Compare

CaseIH Puma 140 Compare

Related Questions

how big is the engine in CaseIH Magnum 210 farm tractor? What is the fuel capacity of CaseIH Magnum 210?