Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare
Compare
CaseIH Farmall 85U | VS | All other Farm Tractors |
Production | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Year | 2008 | ||||
Production Manufacturer | Caseih | vs | 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH |
||
Factory | Jesi, Italy |
Capacity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capacity Fuel |
33.5 gal (36.85 gal lower than average)
|
vs |
70.35 gal
|
Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear RPMs |
540 (68.25 lower than average)
|
vs |
608.25
|
||
Rear PTO | Independent | vs | 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent |
Mechanical | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mechanical Steering | Hydrostatic Power | vs | 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power |
||
Chassis | 4x2 2wd | vs | 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD |
||
Brakes | Hydraulic Wet Disc | vs | 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc |
||
Cab | Flat Deck Platform With Rops |
Transmission | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transmission Clutch | Dry Disc | ||||
Transmission Type | Mechanical Shuttle | vs | 5% Farm Tractors have mechanical shuttle |
||
Transmission Comments | Three Ranges With Four Gears Per Range. Left-hand Reverser Requires Use Of Clutch To Change Directions | ||||
Transmission Gears |
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
|
vs |
15.13 forward
|
Dimensions | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wheelbase |
92.2 inches (2.13 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
94.33 inches
|
||
Height (cab) |
100.8 inches (8.74 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
109.54 inches
|
||
Height (ROPS) |
108.9 inches (14.76 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
94.14 inches
|
||
Height (exhaust) |
117.5 inches (2.17 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
119.67 inches
|
Hydraulics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydraulics Type | Open Center | ||||
Hydraulics Valves |
2 rear (0.64 rear lower than average)
|
vs |
2.64 rear
|
||
Pump flow |
16.1 gpm (3.36 gpm lower than average)
|
vs |
19.46 gpm
|
||
Total flow |
26.5 gpm (1.85 gpm higher than average)
|
vs |
24.65 gpm
|
||
Steering flow |
10.4 gpm (3.56 gpm higher than average)
|
vs |
6.84 gpm
|
Transmission-2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transmission-2 Clutch | Dry Disc | ||||
Transmission-2 Type | Mechanical Shuttle With Creeper | ||||
Transmission-2 Comments | 12x12 Power Shuttle With High-low Power Shift. | ||||
Transmission-2 Gears |
20 forward (0.15 forward lower than average)
|
vs |
20.15 forward
|
Loader | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loader Loader type | Caseih L730 | ||||
Loader Height (to pin) |
136 inches (19.3 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
116.70 inches
|
||
Loader Dump clearance |
98 inches (7.02 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
90.98 inches
|
||
Loader Dump reach |
33 inches (3.12 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
29.88 inches
|
||
Loader Dump angle |
57 (7.94 higher than average)
|
vs |
49.06
|
||
Loader Rollback angle |
46 (11.92 higher than average)
|
vs |
34.08
|
||
Loader Lift to full height (at pin) |
2500 lbs (2498 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
2,412 lbs
|
||
Loader Breakout force (lift) |
3100 lbs (3097 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
3,764 lbs
|
Loader-2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loader-2 Loader type | Caseih L740 | ||||
Loader-2 Height (to pin) |
144 inches (14.1 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
129.90 inches
|
||
Loader-2 Dump clearance |
106 inches (5.49 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
100.51 inches
|
||
Loader-2 Dump reach |
34 inches (3.92 inches lower than average)
|
vs |
37.92 inches
|
||
Loader-2 Dump angle |
59 (2.01 higher than average)
|
vs |
56.99
|
||
Loader-2 Rollback angle |
46 (218.73 lower than average)
|
vs |
264.73
|
||
Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin) |
3200 lbs (3197 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
3,151 lbs
|
||
Loader-2 Breakout force (lift) |
3850 lbs (3847 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
3,581 lbs
|
3-Point Hitch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear Type |
II (36.36 lower than average)
|
vs | 23.3% Farm Tractors have II |
||
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) |
5745 lbs (5739 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
6,099 lbs
|
||
Control | Mechanical Lower-link Draft Control, Optional Electronic Draft Control (edc) |
Power | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTO (claimed) |
70 hp (42.68 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
112.68 hp
|
||
PTO (tested) |
74.6 hp (102.65 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
177.25 hp
|
||
Engine (gross) |
85 hp (10.15 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
95.15 hp
|
Electrical | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ground | Negative | ||||
Charging system | Alternator | ||||
Charging amps |
120 (8.88 higher than average)
|
vs |
111.12
|
Battery | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volts |
12 (equals average)
|
vs |
12.00
|
||
Number |
1 (0.65 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.65
|
||
Cold-cranking amps |
960 (121.48 higher than average)
|
vs |
838.52
|