VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall 85U

CaseIH Farmall 85U

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall 85U VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Jesi, Italy 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
33.5 gal (36.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Flat Deck Platform With Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
274 ci (32.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2300  (2298 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Elements 
Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
85 hp (44.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Grid Heater 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Dry Disc 
Transmission Type Mechanical Shuttle  vs 5% Farm Tractors have mechanical shuttle
Transmission Comments Three Ranges With Four Gears Per Range. Left-hand Reverser Requires Use Of Clutch To Change Directions 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
92.2 inches (2.13 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Height (cab)
100.8 inches (8.74 inches lower than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Height (ROPS)
108.9 inches (14.76 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Height (exhaust)
117.5 inches (2.17 inches lower than average)
vs
119.67 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
2 rear (0.64 rear lower than average)
vs
2.64 rear

Pump flow
16.1 gpm (3.36 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
26.5 gpm (1.85 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
10.4 gpm (3.56 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Dry Disc 
Transmission-2 Type Mechanical Shuttle With Creeper 
Transmission-2 Comments 12x12 Power Shuttle With High-low Power Shift. 
Transmission-2 Gears
20 forward (0.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih L730 
Loader Height (to pin)
136 inches (19.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
98 inches (7.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
33 inches (3.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
57  (7.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
46  (11.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2500 lbs (2498 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Breakout force (lift)
3100 lbs (3097 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,764 lbs

Loader-2
Loader-2 Loader type Caseih L740 
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
144 inches (14.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
106 inches (5.49 inches higher than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
34 inches (3.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
59  (2.01 higher than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
46  (218.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
3200 lbs (3197 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

Loader-2 Breakout force (lift)
3850 lbs (3847 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,581 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
II  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 23.3% Farm Tractors have II
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
5745 lbs (5739 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Control Mechanical Lower-link Draft Control, Optional Electronic Draft Control (edc) 
Power
PTO (claimed)
70 hp (42.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
74.6 hp (102.65 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Engine (gross)
85 hp (10.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
960  (121.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved