VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall 90

CaseIH Farmall 90

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Farmall 90
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall 90 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Turk Tractor  vs 0.9% Farm Tractors have Turk Tractor
Factory Ankara, Turkey 
Distributor Caseih 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
23.8 gal (46.55 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Mechanical Dry Clutch  vs 3.5% Farm Tractors have mechanical dry clutch
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Flat Deck Platform With Rops. Cab Optional. 
Differential lock Mechanical Rear Lock 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Direct Injection With Mechanical Governor  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have diesel direct injection with mechanical governor
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.196 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
274 ci (32.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2300  (2298 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Elements 
Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
84 hp (45.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Thermostart 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Mechanical Dry Disc 
Transmission Type Mechanical Shuttle  vs 5% Farm Tractors have mechanical shuttle
Transmission Comments Three Ranges With Four Gears Per Range. Left-hand Reverser Requires Use Of Clutch To Change Directions 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Height (cab)
103.1 inches (6.44 inches lower than average)
vs
109.54 inches

2WD Wheelbase
91 inches (5.08 inches lower than average)
vs
96.08 inches

4WD Wheelbase
87 inches (9.03 inches lower than average)
vs
96.03 inches

Height (ROPS)
101.1 inches (6.96 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Pressure
2755 psi (2753 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Pump flow
13.6 gpm (5.86 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
21.7 gpm (2.95 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Rear valves
1 to (1.55 to lower than average)
vs
2.55 to

Steering flow
8.1 gpm (1.26 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Mechanical Shuttle With Creeper 
Transmission-2 Gears
20 forward (0.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih L730 
Loader Height (to pin)
136 inches (19.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
98 inches (7.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
36 inches (6.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
58  (8.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
45  (10.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2500 lbs (2498 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Breakout force (lift)
3300 lbs (3297 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,764 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
II  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 23.3% Farm Tractors have II
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
5025 lbs (5019 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Control Position Control And Mechanical Lower-link Draft Sensing 
Power
PTO (claimed)
70 hp (42.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
73.5 hp (103.75 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
65.2 hp (98.75 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine (gross)
84 hp (11.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
85  (26.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
800  (38.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved