VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall 55A

CaseIH Farmall 55A

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Farmall 55A
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall 55A VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2010  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory India 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
13.5 gal (56.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Differential Mechanical Wet Disc  vs 1.5% Farm Tractors have differential mechanical wet disc
Cab Two-post Foldable Rops. 
Differential lock Mechanical Rear Differential Lock With Foot Pedal, Limited Slip 4wd Front Axle 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
ISM  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have ISM
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.307x3.937 Inches [84 X 100 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
135 ci (171.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 23.4:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2700  (2698 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Element 
Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
55 hp (74.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Clutch 11-inch Dry Disc 
Transmission Type Synchronized Shuttle  vs 10.4% Farm Tractors have synchronized shuttle
Transmission Comments Four Gears In Two Ranges. Synchronized Mechanical Shuttle With Left-hand Lever. Tractor Must Be Stopped To Shift Gears Or Ranges. 
Transmission Gears
8 forward (7.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds Reverse Speeds About 5% Faster Than Forward. 
Dimensions
Dimensions Width
66.1 inches (6.08 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

2WD Weight (shipping)
3770 lbs (3764 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,392 lbs

4WD Weight (shipping)
4078 lbs (4070 lbs higher than average)
vs
8,748 lbs

Front tread 57.1 To 72.6 Inches [145 To 184 Cm] 
Rear tread 56.5 To 72.5 Inches [143 To 184 Cm] 
Height
93.9 inches (13.07 inches lower than average)
vs
106.97 inches

4WD Weight (operating) 4,385 lbs 
4WD Wheelbase
87 inches (9.03 inches lower than average)
vs
96.03 inches

2WD Length
131.1 inches (24.44 inches lower than average)
vs
155.54 inches

4WD Length
133.5 inches (26.84 inches lower than average)
vs
160.34 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center Fixed Displacement Gear Pump 
Hydraulics Valves
1 or (1.64 or lower than average)
vs
2.64 or

Pump flow
11.6 gpm (7.86 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
16.9 gpm (7.75 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih L530 
Loader Height (to pin)
111 inches (5.7 inches lower than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump reach
23 inches (6.88 inches lower than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
43  (6.06 lower than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2624 lbs (2622 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at pin)
4299 lbs (4296 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,719 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2580 lbs (2574 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Control Position Control With Mechanical Draft Sensing 
Power
PTO (claimed)
47 hp (65.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
49.36 hp (127.89 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Engine (gross)
55 hp (40.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
55  (56.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
2WD Standard tires (ag) Front: 6x16. Rear: 14.9x28 
4WD Standard tires (ag) Front: 9.5x24. Rear: 14.9x28 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
800  (38.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved