VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall 50B

CaseIH Farmall 50B

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Farmall 50B
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall 50B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2012  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
9.5 gal (60.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Electro-hydraulic  vs 28.9% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Cab Two-post Foldable Rops. 
Differential lock Mechanical Rear 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Mitsubishi S4ql  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have Mitsubishi S4QL
Engine Aspiration Natural  vs 25.8% Farm Tractors have Natural
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
153 ci (153.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2600  (2598 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dry 
Engine Power
47 hp (82.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Glow Plugs 
Transmission
Transmission Type Partially Synchronized  vs 8.2% Farm Tractors have partially synchronized
Transmission Comments Four Synchronized Gears In Four Ranges. 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
69 inches (25.33 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
121 inches (40.96 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Front tread
51.7 inches (6.2 inches higher than average)
vs
45.50 inches

Height (ROPS)
96 inches (1.86 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Pump flow
8.2 gpm (11.26 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Gear Steering flow 4.1 gpm 
Hydro Steering flow 5.5 gpm 
Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Hydrostatic 
Transmission-2 Gears Infinite (3-range) Forward And Reverse 
Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih L350 
Loader Height (to pin)
106.8 inches (9.9 inches lower than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump angle
51.4  (2.34 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
30.3  (3.78 lower than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
1940 lbs (1938 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 500mm)
1370 lbs (89.91 lbs higher than average)
vs
1280.09 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at pin)
3470 lbs (3467 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,719 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at 500mm)
2300 lbs (2298 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,362 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
4.1 s (0.23 s lower than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
3.8 s (1.05 s higher than average)
vs
2.75 s

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
(36.36 lower than average)
vs 26.5% Farm Tractors have I
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
2469 lbs (2463 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Control Position Control 
Rear lift (at ends)
2756 lbs (2750 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
39 hp (73.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine (gross)
47 hp (48.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
50  (61.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
660  (178.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52

Amp-hours
80  (113.44 lower than average)
vs
193.44

Drawbar
Drawbar Two-position Swinging Drawbar 


Scroll To Top

saved