Compare | CaseIH Farmall 60 | VS | New Holland TN60A | |
Production | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Year | 2008 | vs | 2004 | ||
Production Manufacturer | Shibaura | vs | New Holland | ||
Factory | vs | Jesi, Italy | |||
Distributor | Caseih | vs |
Capacity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capacity Fuel |
13.5 gal |
vs | 23 gal |
Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear RPMs |
540 |
vs | 540 |
||
Rear PTO | Independent | vs | Independent |
Mechanical | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mechanical Steering | Hydrostatic Power | vs | Hydrostatic Power | ||
Chassis | 4x4 Mfwd 4wd | vs | 4x2 2wd | ||
Brakes | Wet Disc | vs | Differential Wet Disc | ||
Cab | Rops | vs | Rops. Canopy Optional. |
Hydraulics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydraulics Type | Open Center | vs | Open Center | ||
Hydraulics Valves | vs | 1 to |
|||
Pressure |
2,489 psi |
vs | 2,755 psi |
||
Valve flow |
12 gpm |
vs | 12.4 gpm |
||
Total flow |
17.53 gpm |
vs | |||
Steering flow |
5.5 gpm |
vs | 7.2 gpm |
3-Point Hitch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear Type |
I/ii |
vs | I/ii |
||
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) |
3,465 lbs |
vs | 3,960 lbs |
Power | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTO (claimed) | 50 Hp [37.3 Kw] (power Shuttle)51 Hp [38.0 Kw] (synchro) | vs | 45 hp |
||
PTO (tested) |
51.57 hp |
vs | 48.3 hp |
||
Drawbar (tested) | vs | 38.4 hp |
|||
Engine | vs | 55 hp |
|||
Engine (gross) |
60 hp |
vs | 57 hp |
Electrical | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ground | vs | Negative | |||
Charging system | Alternator | vs | Alternator | ||
Charging amps |
55 |
vs | 65 |
Battery | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volts |
12 |
vs | 12 |
||
Number |
1 |
vs | 1 |
||
Cold-cranking amps |
750 |
vs | 730 |
Variants | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TN60A | vs | Rops | |||
TN60DA | vs | Cab | |||
TN60SA | vs | Supersteer |
cancel