Compare | Challenger MT285B | VS | New Holland TN60A |
Production | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Year | 2005 | vs | 2004 | ||
Production Manufacturer | Iseki | vs | New Holland | ||
Factory | Matsuyama, Japan | vs | Jesi, Italy | ||
Distributor | Agco | vs |
Capacity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capacity Fuel |
13.2 gal |
vs | 23 gal |
Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear RPMs |
540 |
vs | 540 |
||
Rear PTO | Independent | vs | Independent | ||
Mid PTO | Optional | vs | |||
Mid RPMs |
2000 |
vs |
Mechanical | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mechanical Steering | Hydrostatic Power | vs | Hydrostatic Power | ||
Chassis | 4x4 Mfwd 4wd | vs | 4x2 2wd | ||
Brakes | Wet Disc | vs | Differential Wet Disc | ||
Cab | Two-post Foldable Rops | vs | Rops. Canopy Optional. |
3-Point Hitch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear Type |
I |
vs | I/ii |
||
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) |
3,086 lbs |
vs | 3,960 lbs |
||
Rear lift (at ends) |
3,483 lbs |
vs |
Power | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTO (claimed) | 38.0 Hp [28.3 Kw] (gear)36.5 Hp [27.2 Kw] (hydro) | vs | 45 hp |
||
PTO (tested) | vs | 48.3 hp |
|||
Drawbar (tested) | vs | 38.4 hp |
|||
Engine |
47.5 hp |
vs | 55 hp |
||
Engine (gross) | vs | 57 hp |
Electrical | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ground | Negative | vs | Negative | ||
Charging system | Alternator | vs | Alternator | ||
Charging amps |
40 |
vs | 65 |
Tires | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag front |
9.5-16 |
vs | 9.5x15 (2wd) | ||
Ag rear |
16.9-24 |
vs | 14.9 |
||
Lawn/turf front | 27x10.50-15 | vs | |||
Lawn/turf rear | 44x18.00-20 | vs | |||
Industrial front |
10-16.5 |
vs | |||
Industrial rear |
17.5l-24 |
vs |
Battery | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volts |
12 |
vs | 12 |
||
Number |
1 |
vs | 1 |
||
Cold-cranking amps | vs | 730 |
Variants | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TN60A | vs | Rops | |||
TN60DA | vs | Cab | |||
TN60SA | vs | Supersteer |
cancel