VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland Workmaster 65

New Holland Workmaster 65

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
New Holland Workmaster 65
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland Workmaster 65 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2009  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Factory India 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
16.4 gal (53.95 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Differential Mechanical Wet Disc  vs 1.5% Farm Tractors have differential mechanical wet disc
Cab Two-post Foldable Rops 
Differential lock Mechanical Rear Lock Engaged By Foot Pedal, Limited Slip Front Differential (4wd) 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbochared  vs 0.1% Farm Tractors have turbochared
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.898x4.094 Inches [99 X 104 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
195 ci (111.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2500  (2498 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Element 
Engine Emissions Tier Iii 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
65 hp (64.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Clutch 11-inch Dry Organic Plate 
Transmission Type Partially Synchronized  vs 8.2% Farm Tractors have partially synchronized
Transmission Comments Four Gears In Two Ranges. Gear Shifts 3-4 And 7-8 Are Synchronized. 
Transmission Gears
8 forward (7.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
66.1 inches (6.08 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Length
131.1 inches (30.86 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

2WD Weight (shipping)
5059 lbs (5053 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,392 lbs

4WD Weight (shipping)
5690 lbs (5682 lbs higher than average)
vs
8,748 lbs

Height
93.9 inches (13.07 inches lower than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center Fixed Displacement 
Pump flow
10.4 gpm (9.06 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
18.7 gpm (5.95 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Rear valves
1 or (1.55 or lower than average)
vs
2.55 or

Steering flow
5.3 gpm (1.54 gpm lower than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Mid valves 2 (loader) 
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Control Position Control And Mechanical Draft Sensing 
Rear lift (at ends)
3280 lbs (3274 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
57 hp (55.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
61.7 hp (115.55 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Engine (gross)
65 hp (30.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
65  (46.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Charging volts
12  (1.48 lower than average)
vs
13.48

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Cold-cranking amps
800  (38.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved