VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland TK4060

New Holland TK4060

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland TK4060 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2009  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Factory Jesi, Italy 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
29 gal (41.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Chassis Crawler  vs 3.9% Farm Tractors have crawler
Cab Platform With Folding Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type New Holland Nef  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have New Holland NEF
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
274 ci (32.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2500  (2498 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Power
99 hp (30.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Type Unsynchronized  vs 1% Farm Tractors have unsynchronized
Transmission Gears
8 forward (7.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
68.9 inches (3.28 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Length
135 inches (26.96 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
56.3 inches (50.67 inches lower than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Height (ROPS)
91.5 inches (2.64 inches lower than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
3 to (0.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2755 psi (2753 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Valve flow
11.9 gpm (5.18 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
17.7 gpm (6.95 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
5.8 gpm (1.04 gpm lower than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Power
PTO (claimed)
86 hp (26.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine (gross)
99 hp (3.85 hp higher than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front 17.7-inch Tracks 
Ag rear 17.7-inch Tracks 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
800  (38.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved