VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland TD5030

New Holland TD5030

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
New Holland TD5030
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland TD5030 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2009  
Production Manufacturer Turk Tractor  vs 0.9% Farm Tractors have Turk Tractor
Factory Ankara, Turkey 
Distributor New Holland 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
23.8 gal (46.55 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Cab Cab Standard With Optional Air-conditioning. Optional Rops. 
Differential lock Optional Electro-hydraulic Rear Differential Lock, Limited Slip Front Differential 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Direct Injection  vs 3.6% Farm Tractors have diesel direct injection
Engine Type
FPT F5C  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 0.5% Farm Tractors have FPT F5C
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.898x4.094 Inches [99 X 104 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
195 ci (111.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2500  (2498 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
241.9 lb (218.2 lb lower than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1250  (200.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Element 
Engine Valves
(13.13 lower than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Oil change
600 h (228.92 h higher than average)
vs
371.08 h

Rated Power (ECE R120)
82 hp (73 hp lower than average)
vs
155.00 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Synchro Command 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Length
162.4 inches (0.44 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (cab)
101.5 inches (8.04 inches lower than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Rear tread 55.12 To 78.74 Inches [140 To 199 Cm] 
2WD Wheelbase
89.8 inches (6.28 inches lower than average)
vs
96.08 inches

4WD Wheelbase
87.6 inches (8.43 inches lower than average)
vs
96.03 inches

Height (ROPS)
106.7 inches (12.56 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Weight (max capacity)
12790 lbs (12741 lbs higher than average)
vs
49,610 lbs

2WD ROPS Weight (operating)
6393 lbs (6387 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,203 lbs

4WD ROPS Weight (operating)
7385 lbs (7378 lbs higher than average)
vs
7,239 lbs

4WD Cab Weight (operating)
7981 lbs (7974 lbs higher than average)
vs
7,971 lbs

2WD cab Weight (operating)
7011 lbs (7005 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,975 lbs

2WD[140 to 190 cm] 2WD} 61.42 to 78.74 inches {4WD}[156 to 199 cm] {4WD} Front tread 55.31 to 
Hydraulics
Pump flow
11.89 gpm (7.57 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Rear valves
1 to (1.55 to lower than average)
vs
2.55 to

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Partially Synchronized Mechanical Shuttle 
Transmission-2 Transmission Synchro Shuttle 
Transmission-2 Gears
12 forward (8.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Loader type New Holland 90fl 
Loader-2
Loader-2 Loader type New Holland 100fl 
Power
PTO (tested)
72.1 hp (105.15 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
59.7 hp (104.25 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine (gross)
82 hp (13.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Tires
2WD Standard tires (ag) Front: 7.50-16. Rear: 16.9/r30 
4WD Standard tires (ag) Front: 11.2r24. Rear: 16.9/r30 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00



Scroll To Top

saved