VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland T8050

New Holland T8050

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
New Holland T8050
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland T8050 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Factory Racine, Wisconsin, Usa 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
180 gal (109.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Engine RPMs 540@19881000@1984   vs 0.5% Farm Tractors have 540@19881000@1984
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard With Heat And Air-conditioning. Optional Luxury Cab With Leather Seats, Tinted Windows, And Sunscreens. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type New Holland  vs 3.7% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.488x5.689 Inches [114 X 145 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
540 ci (233.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.6:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Starter Electric 
Transmission
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Gears
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
129.3 inches (34.97 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
24095 lbs (24077 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Weight (ballasted)
34500 lbs (34477 lbs higher than average)
vs
23,578 lbs

Weight (max capacity)
34500 lbs (34451 lbs higher than average)
vs
49,610 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Valves
3 to (0.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Total flow
44 gpm (19.35 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission-2 Type Full Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Gears
19 forward (1.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Transmission-2 Speeds   
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type IVN/III  
Rear lift
18590 lbs (18579 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
270 hp (157.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
274.86 hp (97.61 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
234.7 hp (70.75 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Electrical
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
150  (38.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front
16.9R30  (7.2 lower than average)
vs 2.5% Farm Tractors have 16.9R30
Ag rear
20.8R42  (3.99 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have 20.8R42


Scroll To Top

saved