VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland T8.275

New Holland T8.275

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
New Holland T8.275
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland T8.275 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2011  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Factory Racine, Wisconsin, Usa 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
168 gal (97.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Exhaust fluid (DEF)
24 gal (3.99 gal lower than average)
vs
27.99 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Front PTO Optional  vs 86.9% Farm Tractors have optional
Front RPMs 1000 (1-3/4)   vs 4.3% Farm Tractors have 1000 (1-3/4)
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
531 ci (224.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
232 hp (102.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Starter type Electric 
Engine Emissions Interim Tier 4 
Maximum Power
273 hp (107.67 hp lower than average)
vs
380.67 hp

Transmission
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Gears
19 forward (3.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
135.8 inches (41.47 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Rear tread 60 To 88 Inches [152 To 223 Cm] 
Weight (max capacity)
27750 lbs (27701 lbs higher than average)
vs
49,610 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Load Sensing 
Pump flow
35 gpm (15.54 gpm higher than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
42.5 gpm (17.85 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Rear valves
4 to (1.45 to higher than average)
vs
2.55 to

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Full Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Gears
18 forward (2.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 3/3N  
Rear lift
14080 lbs (14069 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Front Hitch Optional 
Power
PTO (claimed)
185 hp (72.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
232 hp (84.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
200  (88.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Charging volts
12  (1.48 lower than average)
vs
13.48

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65



Scroll To Top

saved