VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland T6060 Elite

New Holland T6060 Elite

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
New Holland T6060 Elite
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland T6060 Elite VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Factory Basildon, England 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
46.5 gal (23.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system
16.3 gal (3.12 gal lower than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Horizon Cab Standard With Air-conditioning. Optional Deluxe Cab With Automatic Temperature Control And Air-ride Seat. Optional Comfort Ride Cab Suspension. Programmable Headland Management System. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel High-pressure Common Rail  vs 2% Farm Tractors have diesel high-pressure common rail
Engine Type
FPT NEF  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 1.3% Farm Tractors have FPT NEF
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Air-to-air Intercooled  vs 0.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged air-to-air intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
273.7 ci (32.4 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 16.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements And Aspirator 
Engine Valves
16  (5.13 lower than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Oil capacity
16 qts (0.93 qts lower than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
130 hp (0.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Four Gears (1-4) In Four Ranges (a-d). Power Shift Between Gears And Ranges A-b And C-d. Autoshift Provides Automatic Shifting In Ranges A, B, C, And A Road Setting For Combined Ranges C-d. Economy Autoshift Offers An Overdrive 17th Gear. High-speed Option Provides A 50 Kph High-speed 17th Gear. 
Transmission Transmission Autoshift 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
95 inches (0.67 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
12465 lbs (12447 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Height (cab)
113.4 inches (3.86 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Front tread 62.2 To 92 Inches [157 To 233 Cm] 
Height (exhaust)
112.4 inches (7.27 inches lower than average)
vs
119.67 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Load Sensing 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pump flow
26.5 gpm (7.04 gpm higher than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Capacity (cu. ft.)
16.3 gal (3.12 gal lower than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Total flow
37 gpm (12.35 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
10.5 gpm (3.66 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Loader
Loader Weight
1220 lbs (50.69 lbs higher than average)
vs
1169.31 lbs

Loader Loader type New Holland 830tl 
Loader Height (to pin)
156 inches (39.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
118 inches (27.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
38 inches (8.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
57  (7.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
45  (10.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
5350 lbs (5348 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3700 lbs (3697 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,565 lbs

Loader Reach at ground
102 inches (29.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

Loader Breakout force (at pin)
6500 lbs (6497 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,719 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)
4400 lbs (4396 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,430 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
3.5 s (0.83 s lower than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
3 s (0.25 s higher than average)
vs
2.75 s

Loader Lowering time
2.7 s (0.46 s lower than average)
vs
3.16 s

Loader Rollback time
2 s (0.74 s lower than average)
vs
2.74 s

Loader Lift to 1.5m (at pin)
6050 lbs (6047 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,343 lbs

Loader Lift to 1.5m (at 800mm)
4200 lbs (4196 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,316 lbs

Loader-2
Loader-2 Weight
1220 lbs (354.43 lbs lower than average)
vs
1574.43 lbs

Loader-2 Loader type New Holland 840tl 
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
154 inches (24.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
116 inches (15.49 inches higher than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
31 inches (6.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
57  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
45  (219.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
5000 lbs (4997 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3460 lbs (3457 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,137 lbs

Loader-2 Reach at ground
100 inches (14.59 inches higher than average)
vs
85.41 inches

Loader-2 Breakout force (at pin)
6070 lbs (6066 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,937 lbs

Loader-2 Breakout force (at 800mm)
4110 lbs (4106 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,543 lbs

Loader-2 Raise time to height
5.4 s (0.51 s higher than average)
vs
4.89 s

Loader-2 Bucket dump time
4 s (0.6 s higher than average)
vs
3.40 s

Loader-2 Lowering time
4.2 s (0.48 s higher than average)
vs
3.72 s

Loader-2 Rollback time
3 s (0.14 s lower than average)
vs
3.14 s

Loader-2 Lift to 1.5m (at pin)
5650 lbs (5646 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,811 lbs

Loader-2 Lift to 1.5m (at 800mm)
3920 lbs (3916 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,252 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 2/3N  
Rear lift
12185 lbs (12174 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Control Electronic Lower-link Draft Control 
Power
PTO (claimed)
110 hp (2.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
121.4 hp (55.85 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
89.2 hp (74.75 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine (gross)
130 hp (34.85 hp higher than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Charging volts
12  (1.48 lower than average)
vs
13.48

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Cold-cranking amps
960  (121.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved