VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland Boomer 35

New Holland Boomer 35

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
New Holland Boomer 35
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland Boomer 35 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2011  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mid PTO Optional Independent  vs 3.2% Farm Tractors have optional independent
Mid RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,034

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Mechanical Wet Disc  vs 1.5% Farm Tractors have differential mechanical wet disc
Cab Foldable Rops. 
Differential lock Mechanical Foot-activated 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
CNH  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 4.6% Farm Tractors have CNH
Engine Aspiration Natural  vs 25.8% Farm Tractors have Natural
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
107 ci (199.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2700  (2698 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Element 
Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Power
38 hp (91.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Glow Plugs 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Dry 9.4-inch Organic Plate 
Transmission Type Synchronized Shuttle  vs 10.4% Farm Tractors have synchronized shuttle
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
64 inches (8.18 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
66 inches (28.33 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
119 inches (42.96 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Valve flow
8.2 gpm (8.88 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
12.3 gpm (12.35 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
4.1 gpm (2.74 gpm lower than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Hydrostatic 
Transmission-2 Gears Infinite (3-range) Forward And Reverse 
Loader
Loader Loader type New Holland 240tl 
Loader Height (to pin)
97.6 inches (19.1 inches lower than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump angle
41.3  (7.76 lower than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
30.4  (3.68 lower than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
1370 lbs (1368 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 500mm)
1100 lbs (180.09 lbs lower than average)
vs
1280.09 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at pin)
2925 lbs (2922 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,719 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at 500mm)
2250 lbs (2248 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,362 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
3.8 s (0.53 s lower than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
2 s (0.75 s lower than average)
vs
2.75 s

Loader Lowering time
1.7 s (1.46 s lower than average)
vs
3.16 s

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
(36.36 lower than average)
vs 26.5% Farm Tractors have I
Rear lift (at ends)
1807 lbs (1801 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed) 32.2 Hp [24.0 Kw] (gear)30.3 Hp [22.6 Kw] (hydro) 
Engine (gross)
38 hp (57.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
50  (61.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Charging volts
12  (1.48 lower than average)
vs
13.48

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Cold-cranking amps
660  (178.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52

Amp-hours
80  (113.44 lower than average)
vs
193.44



Scroll To Top

saved