VS

Home > Farm Tractors > McCormick Intl CX105

McCormick Intl CX105

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
McCormick Intl CX105
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
McCormick Intl CX105 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2003  
Production Manufacturer Mccormick Intl  vs 3% Farm Tractors have McCormick Intl
Factory Doncaster, England 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
41 gal (29.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system 9.1 Gal [34.4 L] (2wd)9.7 Gal [36.7 L] (4wd) 
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Engine RPMs 540@20001000@2000   vs 2.2% Farm Tractors have 540@20001000@2000
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Rops. Cab Optional. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Perkins  vs 2.9% Farm Tractors have Perkins
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.937x5.00 Inches [100 X 127 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
243.5 ci (62.6 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.25:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
296.5 lb (163.6 lb lower than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Comments The Tier I Engine Was Used From The Start Of The Cx 05 Series In 2003 Until Spring Of 2004. 
Engine Emissions Tier I 
Rated Power (ECE R24)
102 hp (9.24 hp lower than average)
vs
111.24 hp

Transmission
Transmission Clutch Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Eight Gears With A Three-range Power Shift For Each Gear. Optional Creeper Provides 36 Gears Forward And Reverse. 
Transmission Transmission Xtrashift 
Transmission Gears
24 forward (8.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase
92.91 inches (1.42 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
8280 lbs (8262 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Length
165.8 inches (3.84 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
107.9 inches (0.93 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

2WD turn radius
14.4 feet (0.85 feet higher than average)
vs
13.55 feet

4WD turn radius
14.7 feet (3.27 feet lower than average)
vs
17.97 feet

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Capacity (cu. ft.) 9.1 Gal [34.4 L] (2wd)9.7 Gal [36.7 L] (4wd) 
Valve flow
15.85 gpm (1.23 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Dry Disc 
Transmission-2 Type Synchro Shuttle 
Transmission-2 Comments Four Gears In Two Ranges With Two-speed Power Shift. 
Transmission-2 Gears
8 forward (12.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Engine-2
Engine-2 Fuel Diesel 
Engine-2 Type Perkins 1104 Inline 
Engine-2 Aspiration Turbocharged 
Engine-2 Cylinders
(0.34 lower than average)
vs
4.34

Engine-2 Bore/Stroke 4.134x5.00 Inches [105 X 127 Mm] 
Engine-2 Displacement
268.5 ci (19.64 ci lower than average)
vs
288.14 ci

Engine-2 Cooling Liquid 
Engine-2 Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,292

Engine-2 Starter volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Engine-2 Comments The Tier Ii Perkins 1104 Was Introduced In 2004 With The Same Horsepower Rating As The Original Engine. 
Engine-2 Power
102 hp (8.67 hp higher than average)
vs
93.33 hp

Engine-2 Emissions Tier Ii 
3-Point Hitch
Rear lift
8543 lbs (8532 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
83 hp (29.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
86.2 hp (91.05 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
74 hp (89.95 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
102 hp (45.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Engine (net)
102 hp (26.22 hp lower than average)
vs
128.22 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
65  (46.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front
10.00-1612.4R24 (4WD)  (14.1 lower than average)
vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have 10.00-1612.4R24 (4WD)
Ag rear
16.9R34  (7.89 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have 16.9R34
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00



Scroll To Top

saved