VS

Home > Farm Tractors > McCormick Intl CT50U

McCormick Intl CT50U

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
McCormick Intl CT50U VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Mccormick Intl  vs 3% Farm Tractors have McCormick Intl
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
15.85 gal (54.5 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Cab Rops. Cab Optional. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Mitsubishi  vs 0.8% Farm Tractors have Mitsubishi
Engine Aspiration Natural  vs 25.8% Farm Tractors have Natural
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.5x4.1 Inches [89 X 104 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
153 ci (153.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2600  (2598 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Air cleaner Dry Element 
Engine Power
43 hp (86.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
65.7 inches (6.48 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
74 inches (20.33 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
125 inches (36.96 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (ROPS)
94.4 inches (0.26 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Valves
(0.64 lower than average)
vs
2.64

Valve flow
9.1 gpm (7.98 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Steering flow
4.7 gpm (2.14 gpm lower than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Loader
Loader Loader type Mccormick Intl L116 
Loader Height (to pin)
113 inches (3.7 inches lower than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump reach
40 inches (10.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
46  (3.06 lower than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
22  (12.08 lower than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Breakout force (bucket)
4460 lbs (4456 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,271 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2250 lbs (2248 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Bucket width
72 inches (6.08 inches higher than average)
vs
65.92 inches

Backhoe
Backhoe Backhoe type Mccormick Intl 
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
(36.36 lower than average)
vs 26.5% Farm Tractors have I
Rear lift (at ends)
3300 lbs (3294 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
38 hp (74.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
43 hp (104.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Tires
Industrial front 12x16.5 
Industrial rear 17.5lx24 


Scroll To Top

saved