VS

Home > Farm Tractors > McCormick Intl C70

McCormick Intl C70

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
McCormick Intl C70 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2001  
Production Manufacturer Mccormick Intl  vs 3% Farm Tractors have McCormick Intl
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
31.7 gal (38.65 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Perkins 1004.4  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have Perkins 1004.4
Engine Aspiration Natural  vs 25.8% Farm Tractors have Natural
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.0551x5.00 Inches [103 X 127 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
256.3 ci (49.8 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 18.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
209.5 lb (250.6 lb lower than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1400  (50.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Power
73 hp (56.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Synchro 
Transmission Gears
8 forward (7.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Weight (operating)
8265 lbs (8247 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

2WD turn radius
28.9 feet (15.35 feet higher than average)
vs
13.55 feet

4WD turn radius
29.2 feet (11.23 feet higher than average)
vs
17.97 feet

Hydraulics
Valve flow
15.5 gpm (1.58 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Gears
24 forward (3.85 forward higher than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear lift
3664 lbs (3653 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
PTO (tested)
59.7 hp (117.55 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
50.2 hp (113.75 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
73 hp (74.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp



Scroll To Top

saved