VS

Home > Farm Tractors > McCormick Intl C50

McCormick Intl C50

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
McCormick Intl C50 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2001  
Production Manufacturer Mccormick Intl  vs 3% Farm Tractors have McCormick Intl
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
31.7 gal (38.65 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Perkins  vs 2.9% Farm Tractors have Perkins
Engine Aspiration Natural  vs 25.8% Farm Tractors have Natural
Engine Cylinders
(1.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.74x5.00 Inches [95 X 127 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
164.75 ci (141.35 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2250  (2248 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
140.1 lb (320 lb lower than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1200  (250.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Power
53 hp (76.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Synchro 
Transmission Gears
8 forward (7.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
2WD turn radius
24.3 feet (10.75 feet higher than average)
vs
13.55 feet

Hydraulics
Valve flow
16 gpm (1.08 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Gears
16 forward (4.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear lift
3664 lbs (3653 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
Engine
53 hp (94.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp



Scroll To Top

saved