VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Massey Ferguson 1529

Massey Ferguson 1529

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Massey Ferguson 1529
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Massey Ferguson 1529 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Iseki  vs 2.3% Farm Tractors have Iseki
Factory Matsuyama, Japan 
Distributor Massey Ferguson 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
8.3 gal (62.05 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mid RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,034

Mechanical
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Cab Platform With Folding Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Cylinders
(1.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
91.4 ci (214.7 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2500  (2498 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
67.3 lb (392.8 lb lower than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1500  (49.19 higher than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Power
28.4 hp (100.74 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Synchroshuttle 
Transmission Gears
8 forward (7.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
58.1 inches (14.08 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
66.7 inches (27.63 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
120.7 inches (41.26 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (ROPS)
97 inches (2.86 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
1 or (1.64 or lower than average)
vs
2.64 or

Valve flow
7.4 gpm (9.68 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
10.8 gpm (13.85 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
3.4 gpm (3.44 gpm lower than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Loader
Loader Loader type Massey Ferguson L100 
Loader Height (to pin)
98.6 inches (18.1 inches lower than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump angle
32.5  (16.56 lower than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
14.5  (19.58 lower than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Breakout force (bucket)
1401 lbs (1397 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,271 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
1282 lbs (1280 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 500mm)
876 lbs (404.09 lbs lower than average)
vs
1280.09 lbs

Loader Bucket width
60 inches (5.92 inches lower than average)
vs
65.92 inches

Backhoe
Backhoe Backhoe type Massey Ferguson 1570 
Backhoe Digging depth
78 inches (16.06 inches lower than average)
vs
94.06 inches

Backhoe Reach from pivot
102 inches (24.87 inches lower than average)
vs
126.87 inches

Backhoe Bucket force
2400 lbs (2397 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,376 lbs

Backhoe Dipperstick force
1450 lbs (1448 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,098 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
(36.36 lower than average)
vs 26.5% Farm Tractors have I
Rear lift (at ends)
2425 lbs (2419 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
23.2 hp (89.48 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
28.4 hp (119.42 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
40  (71.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65



Scroll To Top

saved