VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Mahindra 6025

Mahindra 6025

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Mahindra 6025
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Mahindra 6025 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Mahindra  vs 2.5% Farm Tractors have Mahindra
Factory Maharashtra, India 
Original price (USD) $15, 465 (2009)  
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Live (2-stage Clutch)  vs 1.5% Farm Tractors have live (2-stage clutch)
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Dry Disc  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have dry disc
Cab Folding Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Mahindra Ne457r  vs 0.1% Farm Tractors have Mahindra NE457R
Engine Aspiration Natural  vs 25.8% Farm Tractors have Natural
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.701x4.528 Inches [94 X 115 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
194.8 ci (111.3 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 19.4:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2100  (2098 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Power
59 hp (70.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Starter type Electric 
Transmission
Transmission Gears
8 forward (7.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
78 inches (5.82 inches higher than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Weight (operating)
4865 lbs (4847 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Length
119 inches (42.96 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

2WD turn radius
11.5 feet (2.05 feet lower than average)
vs
13.55 feet

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
1 or (1.64 or lower than average)
vs
2.64 or

Total flow
10.5 gpm (14.15 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
4.8 gpm (2.04 gpm lower than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Loader
Loader Loader type Mahindra Ml250 
Loader Height (to pin)
126 inches (9.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
104 inches (13.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
20 inches (9.88 inches lower than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
27  (22.06 lower than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
31  (3.08 lower than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2980 lbs (2978 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Breakout force (lift)
4905 lbs (4902 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,764 lbs

Loader Bucket capacity
0.7 cu (0.3 cu higher than average)
vs
0.40 cu

Loader Bucket width
72 inches (6.08 inches higher than average)
vs
65.92 inches

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at ends)
3527 lbs (3521 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
49 hp (63.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
59 hp (88.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
36  (75.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front 7.5x16 
Ag rear 14.9x28 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Amp-hours
96  (97.44 lower than average)
vs
193.44



Scroll To Top

saved