VS

Home > Farm Tractors > John Deere 8270R

John Deere 8270R

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
John Deere 8270R
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
John Deere 8270R VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2009  
Production Manufacturer John Deere  vs 15.9% Farm Tractors have John Deere
Factory Waterloo, Iowa, Usa 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
180 gal (109.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system 40 Gal [151.4 L] 42 Gal [159.0 L] (ils) 
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Commandview Cab Standard With Heat And Air-conditioning. Optional Automatic Temperature Controls, Electronically-controlled Mirrors, Sun Shades, Instructor Seat, And Front/rear Windshield Wipers. 
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) 
Hydraulics Valves
3 to (0.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Capacity (cu. ft.) 40 Gal [151.4 L] 42 Gal [159.0 L] (ils) 
Valve flow
35 gpm (17.92 gpm higher than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
44  (19.35 higher than average)
vs
24.65

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type III/IIINIVN/III  
Rear lift 13, 800 Lbs [6259 Kg] 15, 200 Lbs [6894 Kg] (optional)18, 300 Lbs [8300 Kg] (optional) 
Front Hitch Optional With Ils 
Front lift
11000 lbs (10993 lbs higher than average)
vs
7,658 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
220 hp (107.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
256.8 hp (79.55 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
204.64 hp (40.69 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine (gross)
270 hp (174.85 hp higher than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Engine (net)
261 hp (132.78 hp higher than average)
vs
128.22 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
200  (88.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
925  (86.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved