Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare
Compare
| John Deere 6534 | VS | All other Farm Tractors |
| Production | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Year | 2009 | ||||
| Production Manufacturer | John Deere | vs | 15.9% Farm Tractors have John Deere |
||
| Capacity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity Fuel |
54.7 gal (15.65 gal lower than average)
|
vs |
70.35 gal
|
||
| Hydraulic system |
13.2 gal (6.22 gal lower than average)
|
vs |
19.42 gal
|
||
| Optional Fuel |
66 gal (7.96 gal lower than average)
|
vs |
73.96 gal
|
||
| Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch | Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc | vs | 30.7% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic wet disc |
||
| Rear RPMs |
540 (68.25 lower than average)
|
vs |
608.25
|
||
| Rear PTO | Independent | vs | 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent |
||
| Front RPMs |
1000 (24.69 lower than average)
|
vs |
1024.69
|
||
| Engine RPMs | 540@2143540E@16841000@2208 | vs | 3.3% Farm Tractors have 540@2143540E@16841000@2208 |
||
| Mechanical | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis | 4x4 Mfwd 4wd | vs | 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD |
||
| Brakes | Hydraulic Wet Disc | vs | 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc |
||
| Cab | Two-post Foldable Roll-guard Rops. Cab With Air-conditioning Optional. | ||||
| Differential lock | Rear Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc | ||||
| Hydraulics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydraulics Type | Constant Flow Load Sensing | ||||
| Pressure |
2901 psi (2899 psi higher than average)
|
vs |
2,737 psi
|
||
| Pump flow |
21.4 gpm (1.94 gpm higher than average)
|
vs |
19.46 gpm
|
||
| Capacity (cu. ft.) |
13.2 gal (6.22 gal lower than average)
|
vs |
19.42 gal
|
||
| 3-Point Hitch | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Type |
II (36.36 lower than average)
|
vs | 23.3% Farm Tractors have II |
||
| Rear lift |
11200 lbs (11189 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
11,787 lbs
|
||
| Control | Load And Depth Control With Electronic Lower-link Sensing | ||||
| Power | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engine (gross) |
125 hp (29.85 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
95.15 hp
|
||
| Engine (max) |
131 hp (113.21 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
244.21 hp
|
||
| Engine (net) |
120 hp (8.22 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
128.22 hp
|
||
| Electrical | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ground | Negative | ||||
| Charging system | Alternator | ||||
| Charging amps |
90 (21.12 lower than average)
|
vs |
111.12
|
||
| Optional Charging amps |
154 (equals average)
|
vs |
154.00
|
||
| Battery | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volts |
12 (equals average)
|
vs |
12.00
|
||