VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Cub Cadet 8454

Cub Cadet 8454

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Cub Cadet 8454
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Cub Cadet 8454 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer Cub Cadet  vs 0.8% Farm Tractors have Cub Cadet
Original price (USD) $18, 000 (2007)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
11.5 gal (58.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic  vs 0.8% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Cab Foldable Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Daedong  vs 0.9% Farm Tractors have Daedong
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
134 ci (172.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2600  (2598 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Element, Cyclone Type 
Engine Power
45 hp (84.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Sync Shuttle 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
61 inches (11.18 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
71.6 inches (22.73 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
130.7 inches (31.26 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
95.5 inches (11.47 inches lower than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Valve flow
8.2 gpm (8.88 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
13.1 gpm (11.55 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
4.9 gpm (1.94 gpm lower than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at ends)
2987 lbs (2981 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
38 hp (74.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
45 hp (102.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Tires
Ag front
9.5-16  (14.6 lower than average)
vs
24.10

Ag rear
14.9-24  (9.89 lower than average)
vs
24.79

Lawn/turf front
29 x (6.14 x higher than average)
vs
22.86 x

Lawn/turf rear
21.5 x (6.6 x lower than average)
vs
28.10 x

Industrial front
12 x (11.25 x lower than average)
vs
23.25 x

Industrial rear
17.5 x (5.12 x lower than average)
vs
22.62 x

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65



Scroll To Top

saved