VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT975B

Challenger MT975B

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Challenger MT975B
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT975B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
390 gal (319.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Mechanical
Chassis 4x4 Articulated 4wd  vs 5.5% Farm Tractors have 4x4 articulated 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Cab Standard 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Caterpillar C18 Inline  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have Caterpillar C18 inline
Engine Aspiration Turbo  vs 7.5% Farm Tractors have turbo
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
1106 ci (799.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
570 hp (440.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Powershift 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
200 inches (127.82 inches higher than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
155.5 inches (61.17 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
298 inches (136.04 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
151 inches (44.03 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Weight (max capacity)
60000 lbs (59951 lbs higher than average)
vs
49,610 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pfc 
Hydraulics Valves
4 to (1.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Total flow
43.5  (18.85 higher than average)
vs
24.65

Power
Engine
570 hp (422.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging amps
185  (73.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front 800/70R38  
Ag rear 800/70R38  
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(2.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
1000  (161.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved