VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT865

Challenger MT865

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Challenger MT865
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT865 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2002  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Usa 
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Electro-hydraulic  vs 0.5% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic
Chassis Crawler  vs 3.9% Farm Tractors have crawler
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Caterpillar C16 Vertical  vs 0.1% Farm Tractors have Caterpillar C16 vertical
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 5.512x6.732 Inches [140 X 171 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
964 ci (657.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 15.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2100  (2098 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Power
500 hp (370.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Emissions Tier 2 
Transmission
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
IVN  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 1.5% Farm Tractors have IVN
Power
PTO (tested)
523.6 hp (346.35 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
454.9 hp (290.95 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
500 hp (352.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Tires
Ag front Tracks 
Ag rear Tracks 


Scroll To Top

saved