VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT835B

Challenger MT835B

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Challenger MT835B
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT835B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2005  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Capacity
Capacity Fuel 305 Gal [1154.4 L] 330 Gal [1249.1 L] (optional)  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have 305 gal [1154.4 L] 330 gal [1249.1 L] (optional)
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Electro-hydraulic Power  vs 1.8% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic power
Chassis Crawler  vs 3.9% Farm Tractors have crawler
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Caterpillar C15 Vertical  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have Caterpillar C15 vertical
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 5.402x6.752 Inches [137 X 172 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
930 ci (623.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 16.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2100  (2098 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
1261 lb (800.9 lb higher than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1250  (200.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
350 hp (220.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Cat Powershift 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
140.9 inches (68.72 inches higher than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
118 inches (23.67 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
265.9 inches (103.94 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
138.1 inches (31.13 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pfc 
Hydraulics Valves 46 (optional) 
Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Total flow
43.5  (18.85 higher than average)
vs
24.65

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type III/IVN  
Rear lift
19500 lbs (19489 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
290 hp (177.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
362.8 hp (185.55 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
320.9 hp (156.95 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
350 hp (202.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging amps
185  (73.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front Tracks 
Ag rear Tracks 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(2.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
1000  (161.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved