| Challenger MT765C | VS | All other Farm Tractors |
| Production | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Year | 2009 | ||||
| Production Manufacturer |
AGCO (equals average)
|
vs | 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO |
||
| Factory | Jackson, Minnesota, Usa | ||||
| Capacity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity Fuel |
118 gal (47.65 gal higher than average)
|
vs |
70.35 gal
|
||
| Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear RPMs |
1000 (391.75 higher than average)
|
vs |
608.25
|
||
| Rear PTO | Independent | vs | 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent |
||
| Mechanical | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Steering | Speed Sensitive Differential | vs | 0.6% Farm Tractors have speed sensitive differential |
||
| Chassis | Crawler | vs | 3.9% Farm Tractors have crawler |
||
| Cab | Cab Standard | ||||
| Transmission | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission Clutch | Hydraulic Wet Disc | ||||
| Transmission Type | Full Power Shift | vs | 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift |
||
| Transmission Transmission | Cat Powershift | ||||
| Transmission Gears |
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
|
vs |
15.13 forward
|
||
| Transmission Speeds | |||||
| Dimensions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions Width |
133 inches (60.82 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
72.18 inches
|
||
| Wheelbase |
96 inches (1.67 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
94.33 inches
|
||
| Length |
233 inches (71.04 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
161.96 inches
|
||
| Height (cab) |
135.5 inches (25.96 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
109.54 inches
|
||
| Weight (max capacity) |
36000 lbs (35951 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
49,610 lbs
|
||
| Hydraulics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydraulics Type | Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) | ||||
| Hydraulics Valves |
4 to (1.36 to higher than average)
|
vs |
2.64 to
|
||
| Pressure |
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
|
vs |
2,737 psi
|
||
| Pump flow |
36 gpm (16.54 gpm higher than average)
|
vs |
19.46 gpm
|
||
| Total flow |
43.5 gpm (18.85 gpm higher than average)
|
vs |
24.65 gpm
|
||
| 3-Point Hitch | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Type | III/IIIN | ||||
| Rear lift |
16000 lbs (15989 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
11,787 lbs
|
||
| Power | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTO (claimed) |
265 hp (152.32 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
112.68 hp
|
||
| PTO (tested) |
320.72 hp (143.47 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
177.25 hp
|
||
| Drawbar (tested) |
228.21 hp (64.26 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
163.95 hp
|
||
| Engine (gross) |
320 hp (224.85 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
95.15 hp
|
||
| Electrical | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ground | Negative | ||||
| Tires | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag front | 16, 18, 25, 30 Inch Belts | ||||
| Ag rear | 16, 18, 25, 30 Inch Belts | ||||
Related Comparisons
AGCO DT205B
Challenger MT765C
AGCO DT225B
AGCO DT250B
AGCO DT275B
Challenger MT655C