VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT755B

Challenger MT755B

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT755B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2005  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Jackson, Minnesota, Usa 
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Electro-hydraulic Power  vs 1.8% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic power
Chassis Crawler  vs 3.9% Farm Tractors have crawler
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Caterpillar Vertical  vs 0.1% Farm Tractors have Caterpillar vertical
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.409x5.866 Inches [112 X 149 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
537 ci (230.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.1:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2100  (2098 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
1037 lb (576.9 lb higher than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1201  (249.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Transmission Cat Powershift 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Power
PTO (tested)
315.95 hp (138.7 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
213.58 hp (49.63 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Tires
Ag front Tracks 
Ag rear Tracks 


Scroll To Top

saved