Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare
Compare
Challenger MT665 | VS | All other Farm Tractors |
Production | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model Year | 2002 | ||||
Production Manufacturer |
AGCO (equals average)
|
vs | 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO |
||
Factory | Beauvais, France |
Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear RPMs |
540 (68.25 lower than average)
|
vs |
608.25
|
Mechanical | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mechanical Steering | Hydrostatic Power | vs | 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power |
||
Chassis | 4x4 Mfwd 4wd | vs | 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD |
||
Brakes | Wet Disc | vs | 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc |
Transmission | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transmission Type | Power Shift | vs | 0.3% Farm Tractors have power shift |
||
Transmission Gears |
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
|
vs |
15.13 forward
|
Hydraulics | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydraulics Type | Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) | ||||
Hydraulics Valves |
4 (1.36 higher than average)
|
vs |
2.64
|
||
Pressure |
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
|
vs |
2,737 psi
|
||
Total flow |
29 (4.35 higher than average)
|
vs |
24.65
|
3-Point Hitch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rear Type |
III (36.36 lower than average)
|
vs | 4.7% Farm Tractors have III |
Power | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTO (claimed) |
225 hp (112.32 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
112.68 hp
|
||
PTO (tested) |
239.4 hp (62.15 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
177.25 hp
|
||
Drawbar (tested) |
195.4 hp (31.45 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
163.95 hp
|
Tires | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag front | 600/70R28 | ||||
Ag rear | 650/85R38 |