VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT665

Challenger MT665

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Challenger MT665
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT665 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2002  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Beauvais, France 
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Sisu Vertical  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have SISU vertical
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.370x5.709 Inches [111 X 145 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
513 ci (206.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 16.0:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Transmission
Transmission Type Power Shift  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have power shift
Transmission Gears
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) 
Hydraulics Valves
(1.36 higher than average)
vs
2.64

Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Total flow
29  (4.35 higher than average)
vs
24.65

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
III  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 4.7% Farm Tractors have III
Power
PTO (claimed)
225 hp (112.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
239.4 hp (62.15 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
195.4 hp (31.45 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Tires
Ag front 600/70R28  
Ag rear 650/85R38  


Scroll To Top

saved