VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT635

Challenger MT635

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Challenger MT635
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT635 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2002  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Beauvais, France 
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Sisu Vertical  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have SISU vertical
Engine Aspiration Turbo  vs 7.5% Farm Tractors have turbo
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.251x5.278 Inches [108 X 134 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
449 ci (142.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 16.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Transmission
Transmission Gears
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
III  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 4.7% Farm Tractors have III
Power
PTO (claimed)
160 hp (47.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
174.6 hp (2.65 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
164.5 hp (0.55 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Tires
Ag front
14.9R30  (9.2 lower than average)
vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have 14.9R30
Ag rear
18.4R42  (6.39 lower than average)
vs 0.7% Farm Tractors have 18.4R42


Scroll To Top

saved