VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT535B

Challenger MT535B

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Challenger MT535B
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT535B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Beauvais, France 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
71 gal (0.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system 18.5 Gal [70.0 L] (autopower)26.4 Gal [99.9 L] (cvt) 
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard With Heat And A/c. Optional Pneumatic Cab Suspension And Automatic Climate Control. 
Trailer brakes Hydraulic Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Caterpillar 3056c Vertical Inline  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have Caterpillar 3056C vertical inline
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.937x5.00 Inches [100 X 127 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
365.2 ci (59.1 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Emissions Tier Ii 
Engine Coolant
26.92 qts (3.13 qts higher than average)
vs
23.79 qts

Transmission
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Eight Gears In Four Power Shift Ranges With Power Shuttle. 
Transmission Transmission Autopower Iv 
Transmission Gears
32 forward (16.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
81.1 inches (8.92 inches higher than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
112.1 inches (17.77 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating) 13, 140 Lbs [5960 Kg] (2wd)13, 215 Lbs [5994 Kg] (4wd)14, 835 Lbs [6729 Kg] (cvt 4wd) 
Length
168.5 inches (6.54 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (cab)
112.8 inches (3.26 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Rear tread 60 To 88 Inches [152 To 223 Cm] 
Clearance (drawbar)
15.4 inches (1.48 inches lower than average)
vs
16.88 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) 
Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Capacity (cu. ft.) 18.5 Gal [70.0 L] (autopower)26.4 Gal [99.9 L] (cvt) 
Total flow
29 gpm (4.35 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Rear valves
2 to (0.55 to lower than average)
vs
2.55 to

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Partial Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Comments Four Gears With Six Power Shift Ranges. The Autopower Vi Became Acailable In 2005. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Autopower Vi 
Transmission-2 Gears
24 forward (3.85 forward higher than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Transmission-2 Speeds 50 Kph Speeds Available With Front-axle Suspension. 
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type II/III  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) 9, 391 Lbs [4259 Kg] 11, 200 Lbs [5080 Kg] (cvt)  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have 9 391 lbs [4259 kg] 11 200 lbs [5080 kg] (CVT)
Front Hitch Optional 
Front lift
5500 lbs (5493 lbs higher than average)
vs
7,658 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
105 hp (7.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
118.1 hp (59.15 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
103.8 hp (60.15 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front 11.00-16 (2WD)480/70R28 (4WD)  
Ag rear 580/70R38  
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
420  (418.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved