Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT425

Challenger MT425

Details Rankings Comparisons Related

Challenger MT425

Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare

Challenger MT425

VS

All other Farm Tractors

Production
Model Year		2002
Production Manufacturer		AGCO (equals average)	vs	5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO	Compare similar Production Manufacturer (AGCO)
Factory		England

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs		540 (68.25 lower than average)	vs	608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering		Hydrostatic Power	vs	81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis		4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional	vs	21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes		Wet Disc	vs	40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc

Engine
Engine Fuel		Diesel	vs	87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type		Perkins Vertical	vs	0.7% Farm Tractors have Perkins vertical
Engine Cylinders		4 (0.46 lower than average)	vs	4.46
Engine Bore/Stroke		3.937x5.00 Inches [100 X 127 Mm]
Engine Displacement		243 ci (63.1 ci lower than average)	vs	306.10 ci	Compare similar Engine Displacement (243) ci
Engine Cooling		Liquid	vs	86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression		17.3:1
Engine Rated RPMs		2200 (2198 higher than average)	vs	2,340	Compare similar Engine Rated RPMs (2,200)
Engine Starter volts		12 (0.58 lower than average)	vs	12.58
Engine Air cleaner		Dual Paper Elements

Transmission
Transmission Gears		12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)	vs	15.13 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type		II (36.36 lower than average)	vs	23.3% Farm Tractors have II

Power
PTO (tested)		55.4 hp (121.85 hp lower than average)	vs	177.25 hp
Drawbar (tested)		43.3 hp (120.65 hp lower than average)	vs	163.95 hp

Tires
Ag front		360/70R24
Ag rear		18.4R30 (6.39 lower than average)	vs	0.6% Farm Tractors have 18.4R30

Related Questions

how big is the engine in Challenger MT425 farm tractor?