VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT335B

Challenger MT335B

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Challenger MT335B
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT335B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
29 gal (41.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes Wet Disc  vs 40.8% Farm Tractors have wet disc
Cab Rops Standard, Cab With A/c Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Challenger  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have Challenger
Engine Aspiration Turbo  vs 7.5% Farm Tractors have turbo
Engine Cylinders
(1.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.13x5.00 Inches [105 X 127 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
201.4 ci (104.7 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2150  (2148 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Power
91 hp (38.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Synchro Shuttle 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
72.8 inches (0.62 inches higher than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
82.7 inches (11.63 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length 126 Inches [320 Cm] (2wd)132.3 Inches [336 Cm] (4wd) 
Height
101.4 inches (5.57 inches lower than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Valves
2 or (0.64 or lower than average)
vs
2.64 or

Pressure
2755 psi (2753 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Total flow
15.8 gpm (8.85 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Transmission Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Gears
12 forward (8.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at ends)
5500 lbs (5494 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
75 hp (37.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
91 hp (56.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging amps
80  (31.12 lower than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65



Scroll To Top

saved