VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH MXU125

CaseIH MXU125

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH MXU125
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH MXU125 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Original price (USD) $52, 400 (2005)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
67 gal (3.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Plates  vs 3.5% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic wet plates
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Engine RPMs 540@19691000@2120   vs 2.7% Farm Tractors have 540@19691000@2120
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Two-post Rops. Cab Optional. 
Differential lock Electro-hydraulic Rear Standardfront Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Bosch Electronic Direct Injection With 8-hole Injectors  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have diesel Bosch electronic direct injection with 8-hole injectors
Engine Type
CNH  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 4.6% Farm Tractors have CNH
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.196 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
410.6 ci (104.5 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.0:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Power
125 hp (4.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Grid Heater 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Discs 
Transmission Type Partial Powershift  vs 1.8% Farm Tractors have partial powershift
Transmission Comments Four Gears (1-4) In Three Ranges (i-ii-iii) With Low-high Power Shift. Gears And Ranges Are Synchronized. 
Transmission Gears
24 forward (8.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase 104.4 Inches [265 Cm] (2wd)104.7 Inches [265 Cm] (4wd) 
Weight (operating) 12, 065 Lbs [5472 Kg] (4wd Cab) 
Height (cab) 114.1 Inches [289 Cm] 116.7 Inches [296 Cm] (suspended Cab) 
Height (ROPS)
114.1 inches (19.96 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Height (exhaust)
114.9 inches (4.77 inches lower than average)
vs
119.67 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) Optional 
Pressure 2974 Psi [205.1 Bar] 3118 Psi [215.0 Bar] (pfc) 
Valve flow 19.8 Gpm [74.9 Lpm] 26.5 Gpm [100.3 Lpm] (pfc) 
Total flow
30.3  (5.65 higher than average)
vs
24.65

Rear valves
2 to (0.55 to lower than average)
vs
2.55 to

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Discs 
Transmission-2 Type Partial Powershift 
Transmission-2 Comments Four Gears (1-4) In Four Ranges (a-d). Power Shift Between Gears. Auto Shift Feature Automatically Matches Shifts Within Selected Range To Match Load. 
Transmission-2 Gears
16 forward (4.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Transmission-2 Speeds   
Loader
Loader Weight 1, 500 Lbs [680 Kg] 1, 700 Lbs [771 Kg] (mechanical Self-leveling) 
Loader Loader type Caseih Lx156 
Loader Height (to pin)
146 inches (29.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
109 inches (18.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
55 inches (25.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
55  (5.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
40  (5.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm) 3, 500 Lbs [1587 Kg] 3, 800 Lbs [1723 Kg] (pfc) 
Loader Reach at ground
103 inches (30.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm) 4, 800 Lbs [2177 Kg] 5, 300 Lbs [2404 Kg] (pfc) 
Loader Raise time to height
4.6 s (0.27 s higher than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
4 s (1.25 s higher than average)
vs
2.75 s

Loader Lowering time
3 s (0.16 s lower than average)
vs
3.16 s

Loader Rollback time
3 s (0.26 s higher than average)
vs
2.74 s

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type Ii (rops)ii/iiin (cab) 
Rear lift 9, 285 Lbs [4211 Kg] 12, 185 Lbs [5527 Kg] (with Cab) 
Power
PTO (claimed)
105 hp (7.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
121.2 hp (56.05 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
88.5 hp (75.45 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine (gross)
125 hp (29.85 hp higher than average)
vs
95.15 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps 70 (rops)120 (cab) 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Cold-cranking amps
1300  (461.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved