VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH MXU115

CaseIH MXU115

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH MXU115
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH MXU115 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
CNH  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 4.6% Farm Tractors have CNH
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.196 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
410.6 ci (104.5 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.0:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Dimensions
Wheelbase
104.4 inches (10.07 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
111840 lbs (111822 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Partial Powershift 
Transmission-2 Gears
24 forward (3.85 forward higher than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Power
PTO (tested)
104.7 hp (72.55 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
93.4 hp (70.55 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp



Scroll To Top

saved