VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH MXM155 Maxxum

CaseIH MXM155 Maxxum

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH MXM155 Maxxum
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH MXM155 Maxxum VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2002  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
75 gal (4.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system
23.75 gal (4.33 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Electro-hydraulic  vs 28.9% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Pwoer  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic pwoer
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
CNH  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 4.6% Farm Tractors have CNH
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.40x5.00 Inches [112 X 127 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
456.5 ci (150.4 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.0:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Oil capacity
20 qts (3.07 qts higher than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Coolant
27.6 qts (3.81 qts higher than average)
vs
23.79 qts

Transmission
Transmission Type Partial Powershift  vs 1.8% Farm Tractors have partial powershift
Transmission Gears
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase
108.1 inches (13.77 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
12920 lbs (12902 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Length
180.5 inches (18.54 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (cab)
111.4 inches (1.86 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Front tread 60 To 88 Inches (4wd)[152 To 223 Cm] (4wd) 
Rear tread 60 To 88 Inches [152 To 223 Cm] 
4WD turn radius
14.8 feet (3.17 feet lower than average)
vs
17.97 feet

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed-center Load Sensing 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2750 psi (2748 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Pump flow
25 gpm (5.54 gpm higher than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Capacity (cu. ft.)
23.75 gal (4.33 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Total flow
28  (3.35 higher than average)
vs
24.65

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type II/III  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
11690 lbs (11684 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Control Electronic Lower-link Sensing 
Power
PTO (claimed)
125 hp (12.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
133.8 hp (43.45 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
108.5 hp (55.45 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
1300  (461.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52

Amp-hours
176  (17.44 lower than average)
vs
193.44



Scroll To Top

saved