VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH MX285 Magnum

CaseIH MX285 Magnum

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH MX285 Magnum
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH MX285 Magnum VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2003  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Racine, Wisconsin, Usa 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
160 gal (89.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system
45.5 gal (26.08 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Surveyor Cab Standard With Air-conditioning. Optional Automatic Climate Control. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
CDC  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 0.8% Farm Tractors have CDC
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.488x5.315 Inches [114 X 135 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
504.5 ci (198.4 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.0:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
1853 lb (1392.9 lb higher than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1400  (50.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Oil capacity
22 qts (5.07 qts higher than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Emissions Tier Ii 
Engine Coolant
24 qts (0.21 qts higher than average)
vs
23.79 qts

Transmission
Transmission Clutch Electro-hydrauliclly Actuated Wet Discs 
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Gears
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase
118.3 inches (23.97 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
21630 lbs (21612 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Height (cab)
124.6 inches (15.06 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Front tread 60 To 88 Inches [152 To 223 Cm] 
Weight (ballasted)
31500 lbs (31477 lbs higher than average)
vs
23,578 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (pfc) With Parallel Priority 
Hydraulics Valves
3 to (0.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2950 psi (2948 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Capacity (cu. ft.)
45.5 gal (26.08 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Total flow
38.6  (13.95 higher than average)
vs
24.65

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type III/IIIN  
Rear lift 14, 970 Lbs [6790 Kg] 17, 920 Lbs [8128 Kg] (optional) 
Front Hitch Optional 
Front lift
7170 lbs (7163 lbs higher than average)
vs
7,658 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
240 hp (127.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
276.12 hp (98.87 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
203.74 hp (39.79 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
135  (23.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Charging volts
12  (1.48 lower than average)
vs
13.48

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
1000  (161.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved