VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Maxxum 140

CaseIH Maxxum 140

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH Maxxum 140
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Maxxum 140 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Original price (USD) $103, 363 (2011)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
66 gal (4.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 30.7% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic wet disc
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard With Air-conditioning. Suspended Deluxe Cab Optional. Optional Heated Seat With Air Suspension. 
Differential lock Electro-hydraulic 
Trailer brakes Hydraulic Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Electronic High Pressure Common Rail  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have diesel electronic high pressure common rail
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
411 ci (104.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
139 hp (9.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Engine Starter power
5.6 hp (1.97 hp higher than average)
vs
3.63 hp

Transmission
Transmission Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Four Power Shift Gears In Four Ranges. Autoshift Provides Automatic Shifting To Maintain Engine Load. 
Transmission Transmission Autoshift 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase
104.7 inches (10.37 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
12180 lbs (12162 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Height (cab)
114.1 inches (4.56 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Front tread 63.2 To 86.2 Inches (2wd)[160 To 218 Cm] (2wd) 
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pfc 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pump flow
26.5 gpm (7.04 gpm higher than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
37 gpm (12.35 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
10.5 gpm (3.66 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Partial Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Comments The Econo Transmission Provides An Overdrive 17th Gear For Transport Speeds. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Econo 
Transmission-2 Gears
17 forward (3.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Weight 1, 385 Lbs [628 Kg] (without Bucket) 
Loader Loader type Caseih L760 
Loader Height (to pin)
167 inches (50.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
129 inches (38.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
34 inches (4.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
53  (3.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
44  (9.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
6050 lbs (6048 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)
4300 lbs (4297 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,565 lbs

Loader Reach at ground
109 inches (36.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)
5000 lbs (4996 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,430 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
4.9 s (0.57 s higher than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
3.4 s (0.65 s higher than average)
vs
2.75 s

Loader Lowering time
4 s (0.84 s higher than average)
vs
3.16 s

Loader Rollback time
2.7 s (0.04 s lower than average)
vs
2.74 s

Loader-2
Loader-2 Weight 1, 220 Lbs [553 Kg] (without Bucket) 
Loader-2 Loader type Caseih L750 
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
154 inches (24.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
116 inches (15.49 inches higher than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
31 inches (6.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
57  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
45  (219.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
5350 lbs (5347 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3700 lbs (3697 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,137 lbs

Loader-2 Reach at ground
100 inches (14.59 inches higher than average)
vs
85.41 inches

Loader-2 Breakout force (at 800mm)
4400 lbs (4396 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,543 lbs

Loader-2 Raise time to height
3.5 s (1.39 s lower than average)
vs
4.89 s

Loader-2 Bucket dump time
3 s (0.4 s lower than average)
vs
3.40 s

Loader-2 Lowering time
2.7 s (1.02 s lower than average)
vs
3.72 s

Loader-2 Rollback time
2 s (1.14 s lower than average)
vs
3.14 s

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 2/3N  
Rear lift
12185 lbs (12174 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Control Electronic Draft Control 
Power
PTO (claimed)
120 hp (7.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
140.3 hp (36.95 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
107.4 hp (56.55 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
139 hp (8.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Standard tires (ag) Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 18.4r38 (2wd) 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
960  (121.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved