VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Maxxum 130

CaseIH Maxxum 130

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Maxxum 130 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Original price (USD) $94, 784 (2011)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
46.5 gal (23.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 30.7% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic wet disc
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard With Air-conditioning. 
Trailer brakes Hydraulic Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Electronic High Pressure Common Rail  vs 0.2% Farm Tractors have diesel electronic high pressure common rail
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
273 ci (33.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 16.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Valves
16  (5.13 lower than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
130 hp (0.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Transmission
Transmission Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Four Power Shift Gears In Four Ranges. Autoshift Provides Automatic Shifting To Maintain Engine Load. 
Transmission Transmission Autoshift 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
94.9 inches (0.57 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
12465 lbs (12447 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Front tread 61.8 To 92.6 Inches [156 To 235 Cm] 
Height
114.1 inches (7.13 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pfc 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pump flow
26.5 gpm (7.04 gpm higher than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
37 gpm (12.35 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
10.5 gpm (3.66 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Partial Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Comments The Econo Transmission Provides An Overdrive 17th Gear For Transport Speeds. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Econo 
Transmission-2 Gears
17 forward (3.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Weight 1, 135 Lbs [514 Kg] (without Bucket) 
Loader Loader type Caseih L740 
Loader Height (to pin)
145 inches (28.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
107 inches (16.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
31 inches (1.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
63  (13.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
43  (8.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
5080 lbs (5078 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3370 lbs (3367 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,565 lbs

Loader Reach at ground
92 inches (19.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)
4060 lbs (4056 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,430 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
3.1 s (1.23 s lower than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
3 s (0.25 s higher than average)
vs
2.75 s

Loader Lowering time
2.3 s (0.86 s lower than average)
vs
3.16 s

Loader Rollback time
2 s (0.74 s lower than average)
vs
2.74 s

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 2/3N  
Rear lift
9620 lbs (9609 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Control Electronic Draft Control 
Power
PTO (claimed)
110 hp (2.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
121.4 hp (55.85 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
89.2 hp (74.75 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
130 hp (17.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Standard tires (ag) Front: 14.9r28. Rear: 18.4r38 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
960  (121.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved