VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Maxxum 125

CaseIH Maxxum 125

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH Maxxum 125
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Maxxum 125 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Original price (USD) $97, 541 (2011 PRO)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
66 gal (4.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 30.7% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic wet disc
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Two Post Rops. Cab Optional. Deluxe Cab Standard On 125 Pro Model 
Trailer brakes Hydraulic Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Mechanical Injection  vs 0.7% Farm Tractors have diesel mechanical injection
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
411 ci (104.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Valves
12  (9.13 lower than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
125 hp (4.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Transmission
Transmission Type Mechanical Shuttle  vs 5% Farm Tractors have mechanical shuttle
Transmission Comments Four Gears (1-4) In Three Ranges (i-iii). 
Transmission Transmission Synchroshift 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
104.4 inches (10.07 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating) 11, 365 Lbs [5155 Kg] (4wd Rops) 
Height
114.1 inches (7.13 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pump flow
16.6 gpm (2.86 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
27.1 gpm (2.45 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
10.5 gpm (3.66 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission-2 Type Partial Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Comments The 24-speed Transmission Adds A High-low Power Shift To The Base Synchroshift 12-speed Transmission. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Autoshift 
Transmission-2 Gears
24 forward (3.85 forward higher than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Weight 1, 385 Lbs [628 Kg] (without Bucket) 
Loader Loader type Caseih L760 
Loader Height (to pin)
167 inches (50.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
129 inches (38.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
34 inches (4.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
53  (3.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
44  (9.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
6050 lbs (6048 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)
4300 lbs (4297 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,565 lbs

Loader Reach at ground
109 inches (36.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)
5000 lbs (4996 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,430 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
4.9 s (0.57 s higher than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
3.4 s (0.65 s higher than average)
vs
2.75 s

Loader Lowering time
4 s (0.84 s higher than average)
vs
3.16 s

Loader Rollback time
2.7 s (0.04 s lower than average)
vs
2.74 s

Loader-2
Loader-2 Weight 1, 220 Lbs [553 Kg] (without Bucket) 
Loader-2 Loader type Caseih L750 
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
154 inches (24.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
116 inches (15.49 inches higher than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
31 inches (6.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
57  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
45  (219.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
5350 lbs (5347 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3700 lbs (3697 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,137 lbs

Loader-2 Reach at ground
100 inches (14.59 inches higher than average)
vs
85.41 inches

Loader-2 Breakout force (at 800mm)
4400 lbs (4396 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,543 lbs

Loader-2 Raise time to height
3.5 s (1.39 s lower than average)
vs
4.89 s

Loader-2 Bucket dump time
3 s (0.4 s lower than average)
vs
3.40 s

Loader-2 Lowering time
2.7 s (1.02 s lower than average)
vs
3.72 s

Loader-2 Rollback time
2 s (1.14 s lower than average)
vs
3.14 s

Engine-2
Engine-2 Fuel Diesel Electronic High Pressure Common Rail 
Engine-2 Type FPT  
Engine-2 Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled 
Engine-2 Cylinders
(1.66 higher than average)
vs
4.34

Engine-2 Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine-2 Displacement
411 ci (122.86 ci higher than average)
vs
288.14 ci

Engine-2 Cooling Liquid 
Engine-2 Compression 17.5:1  
Engine-2 Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,292

Engine-2 Starter volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Engine-2 Valves
24  (10.13 higher than average)
vs
13.87

Engine-2 Power
125 hp (31.67 hp higher than average)
vs
93.33 hp

Engine-2 Emissions Tier 3 
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 2/3N  
Rear lift
7509 lbs (7498 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Control Mechanical Draft Control 
Power
PTO (claimed)
105 hp (7.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
122.6 hp (54.65 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
90.9 hp (73.05 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
125 hp (22.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Standard tires (ag) Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 18.4r38 (2wd) 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
960  (121.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52

Variants
125 PRO 4wd, Deluxe Cab, Pfc Hydraulics 


Scroll To Top

saved