VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Maxxum 115

CaseIH Maxxum 115

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH Maxxum 115
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Maxxum 115 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Original price (USD) $54, 945 (2011)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
66 gal (4.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Power Take-off (PTO) Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 30.7% Farm Tractors have electro-hydraulic wet disc
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Two-post Rops. Cab Optional. 
Trailer brakes Hydraulic Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Mechanical Injection  vs 0.7% Farm Tractors have diesel mechanical injection
Engine Type
FPT  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 3.4% Farm Tractors have FPT
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
411 ci (104.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Valves
12  (9.13 lower than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
115 hp (14.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Transmission
Transmission Type Mechanical Shuttle  vs 5% Farm Tractors have mechanical shuttle
Transmission Comments Four Gears (1-4) In Three Ranges (i-iii). 
Transmission Transmission Synchroshift 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
104.4 inches (10.07 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating) 10, 900 Lbs [4944 Kg] (4wd Rops) 
Height
114.1 inches (7.13 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pump flow
16.6 gpm (2.86 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
27.1 gpm (2.45 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Steering flow
10.5 gpm (3.66 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission-2 Type Partial Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Comments The 24-speed Transmission Adds A High-low Power Shift To The Base Synchroshift 12-speed Transmission. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Autoshift 
Transmission-2 Gears
24 forward (3.85 forward higher than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Weight 1, 220 Lbs [553 Kg] (without Bucket) 
Loader Loader type Caseih L750 
Loader Height (to pin)
154 inches (37.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
116 inches (25.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
31 inches (1.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
57  (7.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
45  (10.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
5350 lbs (5348 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)
3700 lbs (3697 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,565 lbs

Loader Reach at ground
100 inches (27.27 inches higher than average)
vs
72.73 inches

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)
4400 lbs (4396 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,430 lbs

Loader Raise time to height
3.5 s (0.83 s lower than average)
vs
4.33 s

Loader Bucket dump time
3 s (0.25 s higher than average)
vs
2.75 s

Loader Lowering time
2.7 s (0.46 s lower than average)
vs
3.16 s

Loader Rollback time
2 s (0.74 s lower than average)
vs
2.74 s

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
II  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 23.3% Farm Tractors have II
Rear lift
7509 lbs (7498 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Control Mechanical Draft Control 
Power
PTO (claimed)
95 hp (17.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
111.4 hp (65.85 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
93.3 hp (70.65 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
115 hp (32.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Standard tires (ag) Front: 11.00-16. Rear: 18.4r38 (2wd) 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
960  (121.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved