VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Magnum 215

CaseIH Magnum 215

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Magnum 215
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Magnum 215 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Racine, Wisconsin, Usa 
Original price (USD) $165, 949 (2010)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
180 gal (109.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system
45.5 gal (26.08 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard Wth Heat And A/c. Optional Lucury Cab With Red Or Grey Leather Seat, Tinted Rear Window, And Leather-wrapped Controls. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
CNH  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 4.6% Farm Tractors have CNH
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.488x5.315 Inches [114 X 135 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
504.5 ci (198.4 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
221 hp (91.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Oil capacity
22 qts (5.07 qts higher than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Coolant
24 qts (0.21 qts higher than average)
vs
23.79 qts

Transmission
Transmission Type Full Powershift  vs 4.4% Farm Tractors have full powershift
Transmission Gears
18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
118.3 inches (23.97 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
21035 lbs (21017 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Height
128.5 inches (21.53 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Weight (ballasted)
24070 lbs (24047 lbs higher than average)
vs
23,578 lbs

Weight (max capacity)
26500 lbs (26451 lbs higher than average)
vs
49,610 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type PFC  
Hydraulics Valves
3 to (0.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Capacity (cu. ft.)
45.5 gal (26.08 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Total flow
44  (19.35 higher than average)
vs
24.65

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Full Powershift 
Transmission-2 Gears
19 forward (1.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type Iii/iiinivn/iii Optional 
Rear lift 14, 070 Lbs [6382 Kg] 16, 375 Lbs [7427 Kg] (optional)16, 500 Lbs [7484 Kg] (optional) 
Power
PTO (tested)
215.81 hp (38.56 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
151.54 hp (12.41 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
221 hp (73.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Tires
Ag front 380/85R34  
Ag rear 480/80R46  


Scroll To Top

saved